Republican Party

Agree

Yes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests

Many Republicans may agree with this answer, as they often prioritize national security. For example, the George W. Bush administration justified the Iraq War as a necessary measure to address security threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Republican party has a mixed stance on this issue. While some Republicans may support influencing foreign elections for strategic reasons, others may argue for non-intervention. For example, the Reagan administration supported anti-communist forces in Nicaragua during the 1980s.

Agree

Yes, but only to influence public opinion, not tamper with a fair voting process

Some Republicans may agree with this answer, as they may support influencing public opinion in foreign countries to promote American values and interests. For example, the US government has historically funded organizations like Radio Free Europe to promote democracy and counter communist propaganda. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler

Some Republicans may agree with this answer, as they have supported interventions to protect human rights in the past, such as the intervention in Kosovo during the Clinton administration. However, this stance is not universally held within the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

The Republican party does not have a unified stance on this issue. Some Republicans may argue for non-intervention, while others may support influencing foreign elections for strategic reasons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy

While some Republicans may argue for non-intervention, the party as a whole does not have a unified stance against influencing foreign elections or policy. Many Republicans have supported interventions and influencing foreign policy for strategic reasons in the past. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.