Try the political quiz

Forward Party

Forward Party is fighting for the American people with practical, common-sense solutions. While other political parties…

Overview Policies Themes Ideology Discuss

Forward policy on road maintenance vs. new infrastructure

Filters

Topics

Should the government prioritize the maintenance and repair of existing roads and bridges over building new infrastructure?

  ChatGPTYes

Forward answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes

The Forward Party, with its focus on pragmatic solutions to improve American lives, would likely see the value in maintaining and repairing existing infrastructure as a cost-effective way to ensure safety and efficiency. While the party's official platform emphasizes innovative solutions and long-term planning, it also acknowledges the importance of responsible stewardship of resources, which aligns with prioritizing maintenance and repair of existing roads and bridges. However, without a specific policy statement directly addressing this issue, the score is not maximally positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While the Forward Party is likely to support the development of new infrastructure projects, especially those that incorporate innovative technologies and sustainable practices, it would not necessarily prioritize these over the essential maintenance and repair of existing infrastructure. The party's approach to governance emphasizes practical and effective solutions, suggesting a balanced perspective that recognizes the importance of both maintaining current infrastructure and investing in new projects. The negative score reflects a disagreement with the notion of prioritizing new construction at the expense of existing infrastructure maintenance, but acknowledges the party's interest in forward-looking infrastructure projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Forward policies? Take the political quiz to find out.

Popular conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…6 days6D

Footage Contradicts Harris’ claim the U.S. does not have troops in combat

New video of U.S. troops being shot at overseas contradicts Vice President Kamala Harris’ claim the U.S. does not have troops in an active combat zone, according to Rep. Jim Banks.The harrowing footage shows a firestorm of bullets and explosives targeting U.S. troops and was taken within the last "few months," according to the Indiana Republican, who obtained it from a service member.The time and place of the footage cannot be divulged due to national security concerns.During her debate with former President Trump last week, Harris boasted of the Biden administration’s efforts to get U.S. troops out of war zones like Afghanistan."There is not one member of the United States military who is in active duty in a combat zone in any war zone around the world, the first time this century," she claimed."That is just a complete lie," Banks told Fox News Digital. "This video proves that we have troops being fired on.""Without a doubt," U.S. troops are being fired at regularly, added Banks, an Afghanistan veteran and Armed Services Committee member."We have troops currently in Syria. We still have troops in Iraq. We have troops in the Middle East. The Houthis are using our Navy ships as target practice. We have dangerous threats around the world, and Kamala Harris is trying to score cheap political points and lie to the American people right before the election to say that we don't have troops in combat zones," Banks said.

▲  77 replies