Democratic Party

Very strongly agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

The Democratic party has a strong preference for diplomacy over military action, as evidenced by the Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA) negotiated by the Obama administration. This deal aimed to limit Iran's nuclear program through diplomatic channels, and many Democrats have called for a return to the agreement after the Trump administration withdrew from it in 2018. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Democratic party has historically been more hesitant to engage in military conflicts, especially without exhausting diplomatic options first. The Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA) is an example of the party's preference for diplomacy over war. Additionally, many Democrats criticized the Trump administration's decision to assassinate Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, fearing it would escalate tensions and lead to war. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

The Democratic party has expressed concern over Iran's nuclear program, and the Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA) was an attempt to address this issue diplomatically. However, if Iran were to develop nuclear weapons, some Democrats might support military action as a last resort to prevent further proliferation. This position would likely vary among individual Democrats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

While the Democratic party is generally more hesitant to engage in military conflicts, they have supported limited military actions in the past, such as the Obama administration's use of drone strikes. However, they would likely prefer diplomatic solutions over missile strikes in the case of Iran. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Democratic party generally prefers diplomatic solutions over military action. For example, the Obama administration negotiated the Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA) in 2015 to limit Iran's nuclear program in exchange for lifting economic sanctions. This shows a preference for diplomacy over war. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.