In June 2019 tensions between the U.S. and Iran escalated after a U.S. surveillance drone was shot down by Iran’s revolutionary guard in the Gulf of Oman. The U.S. claimed it was an “unprovoked attack” and the drone was flying in international airspace. 2 weeks earlier the Trump administration blamed Iran for the attacks on two oil tankers who were bombed in the Gulf of Oman. Iran denied any involvement. In early June Iran announced that it would break its uranium stockpile limit set under the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Under the deal Iran was allowed to keep a maximum of 660 pounds of uranium enriched to 3.67%. Analysts predict that if the uranium is enriched to 20% or more Iran would be capable of developing nuclear weapons.
Yes, if that becomes the best option and we know that Russia will stay out of it
Yes, limited strikes as a last resort to prevent Iran from achieving nuclear weapons.
No, we should go to war with The Taliban instead
It's not that easy. If we go to war with Iran, we risk killing innocent civilians.
Yes, only if they are an imminent threat
No, we should go to war with the Taliban
Only if your attacked and if Saudi Arabia has a problem with Iran because their state support of two different sects they need to use their own army because they have the biggest defense bugget in their region.
Not unless they attack us or a threat is imminent
Yes, only if Iran poses a serious threat to us or our allies.
Yes and all muslim countries
No, instead stage a coup to overthrow the current regime, eliminating the threat of violence
Yes, if they attack us.
No, and the U.S should ends its blockade of Iran and apologize for its role in the 1953 coup against Mossadegh and provide reparations
NO and ONLY IF they ATTACK US. Negotiations need to be done to END NUCLEAR weapon construction
Still have much to learn regarding this subject matter
Yes, but only when we absolutely have to.
It depends on what they do
No, the war should be on terrorist groups
Don't have enough info for an informed opinion
Only as the last resort if all other means don't work out
No, unless they strike first or congress passes a bill to go to war.
No, they should be contained through economic sanctions by all NATO and Arab League nations.
No, diplomatic channels should be used first BUT there should always be the possibility of military action of diplomacy does not work. Many factors need to be weighed before the US interjects militarily (to include long term consequences and responsibilities- e.g. troop deployment/presence requirements)
Yes, but not until provoked
Only if all other options where used
Yes, but only after all diplomatic channels have been exhausted
No they shoot at our guys in afghanistan and we are helping them so we should not go to iran.
No, isolating Iran by forming alliances with its adversarial neigbours such has been done with Israel, Bahrein and the United Arab Emirates is the best (non-violent) solution.
No, but keep the pressure on them
Only if Iran forces the US into war.
We should, but only if they keep acting tyrannically towards the US
Yes, but only if they openly attack the US. The US should never strike first.
Only if Iran directly attacks the US on US soil or embassies.
Unless Iran plans to stage military conquest March by being to destroy us assets.
If they continue to disregard the safety of the world with development of certain weapons, strengthening or aiding terrorists organizations, and causing other human attrocities.
I hope not, they should be willing to come to a agreement. They need to sit down and have a long talk. They should come to a treaty .
not unless they attack us first
No, unless they attack the U.S. or one of it’s allies.
No. Our conflict with Iran needs to be handled with diplomacy. Subjugation is not peace. We started the conflict, we are the aggressors here. We must take the steps to true peace through diplomacy and trade.
Only as a last resort and if e are attacked
like all wars, it depends
only as a last resort. extinguish every other option before we go to war
Use all diplomatic strategies first. If that doesn't work, then war should be declared.
Only declare war as a last resort
Yes, if it is the only option.
No, but we will if we have to.
Only if necessary or provoked
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
