These are currently the most active tagged discussions.
Narrow down which types of discussions you would like to see.
Show discussions with the strongest of these emotional reactions:
@ISIDEWITH submitted…8hrs8H
A zoo in Finland is returning two giant pandas to China years ahead of schedule due to financial difficulties. The pandas were originally loaned to the zoo in 2017 as part of a diplomatic gesture to celebrate Finland's 100 years of independence. However, rising inflation and operational costs have made…
▲ 147 replies
Senior Pentagon officials have recommended that the U.S. provide Ukraine with white phosphorus munitions for use on the battlefield, but the White House has rejected the idea several times, according to three U.S. officials familiar with the planning.White phosphorus is a waxy substance that ignites instantly when exposed to oxygen. It burns at a very high temperature and is hard to extinguish. The substance sticks to surfaces — especially clothing or skin — and can cause deadly burns. The chemicals in the smoke, which often smell like garlic, can also harm lungs and eyes. During 20th century conflicts, including World War II and Vietnam, the U.S. used white phosphorus against enemy troops. The U.S. now uses white phosphorus in artillery shells to produce smoke and conceal troop movements and to create light and illuminate the battlefield. The Pentagon recommendation was to provide white phosphorus artillery shells to Ukraine to produce light and smoke, not for use against enemy troops.White phosphorus munitions are not illegal and white phosphorus is not classified as a chemical weapon under the Chemical Weapons Convention. But international law requires militaries who use it to distinguish between military locations and areas where civilians may be concentrated.The Pentagon recommended providing the white phosphorus shells to Ukraine as part of several aid packages, including a recent one, as a Presidential Drawdown Authority, according to the officials. If eventually approved, the PDA announcement would not likely list the chemical, the officials said, as has been done with previous weapons and munitions that the U.S. has sent to Ukraine but not publicly announced.
▲ 146 replies
Just twice since the law changed in 1992 has red Nebraska awarded one of its five electoral college votes to the Democratic presidential candidate, and both times it came from Nebraska’s 2nd Congressional District, which encompasses Omaha. Now, after Harris’s surge through the late summer, Democrats and Republicans alike see a chance for the Omaha area to vote for the Democratic candidate a third time — and maybe even swing the presidential election.Under that not-completely-crazy possibility, Harris and former president Donald Trump could end up dividing up states so evenly that the electoral count could end up at 269 for Harris, 268 for Trump.And then the final vote could be decided right here in Omaha.“Well, we can be the tiebreaking vote for the presidency and people take it really seriously,” said state Sen. Tony Vargas (D), who is challenging the district’s four-term incumbent Rep. Don Bacon (R) in a race to help determine the House majority. “The energy is just incredible. And people take both these things very, very seriously, as a point of pride.”Trump’s campaign has simply surrendered this district, despite winning it in 2016 and losing to Biden here by just 6 percent in 2020. The state legislature even redrew it to be a little less favorable for Democrats.
▲ 155 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…5hrs5H
▲ 76 replies
“So Eric Adams is charged with being a politician??”
▲ 64 replies
▲ 54 replies
@CNN submitted…5hrs5H
▲ 53 replies
@Fox-News submitted…10hrs10H
@NewsNation submitted…7hrs7H
▲ 43 replies
@CNN submitted…10hrs10H
@ISIDEWITH submitted…3hrs3H
▲ 45 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…7hrs7H
▲ 44 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…13hrs13H
▲ 65 replies
@ISIDEWITH submitted…18mins18m
@YouTubePolitics submitted…7hrs7H
▲ 42 replies
@YouTubePolitics submitted…6hrs6H
@LovingeXecutive from Massachusetts commented…5hrs5H
▲ 41 reply1 agree
@LastWeekTonight submitted…9hrs9H
@ISIDEWITH submitted…4hrs4H
▲ 35 replies
@YouTubePolitics submitted…8hrs8H
@Breaking-Points submitted…7hrs7H
@Megyn-KellyRepublican submitted…7hrs7H
▲ 32 replies
