Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

5979 Replies

 @9YJ7DDPConstitution from Tennessee  answered…11mos11MO

For people that medically need it yes. It has fewer negative effects than alcohol. It is not a drug used to oppress the people, so I say yes personally.

 @RWM1999Republican  from Texas  answered…12mos12MO

No, it should be left to the states per the 10th Amendment, but medicinal marijuana should be legalized

 @9NXFDC6Constitution  from Washington  answered…1yr1Y

States have the right to legislate as they will on this issue – the federal government should not be involved. That being said, I personally oppose it.

 @9KZ4VDRConstitution  from California  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, and regulate all the entities that have their fingers in the financial pie and bring it down to something reasonable like any other product.

 @9LPSD2JRepublican from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only for medical use and there must be thorough investigation into those claiming to need it for medical use.

 @9LGT87DConstitution from Missouri  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but the moment the user becomes an offender or a reason an accident happens then arrest them for being under the influence.

 @9K75MRCRepublican from Kansas  answered…2yrs2Y

No, people should focus on working out more cause it helps their mental and physical health than Marijuana does.

 @MJStevens94Republican  from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but I would ideally favor strict regulation with no tax coupled with the legalization of marijuana.

 @9JWV4MLRepublican from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

No, everywhere that this has occured it increasses mental health problems and decreases productivity in the population, because today's cannibis is addictive, has negative impact on the brain, lungs, and other organs.

 @9HV5TH5Republican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but marijuana has proven to be stable within the mainstream population. So, non-violent marijuana drug offenders should be released from serving time.

 @9GGB527Republican from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

Medical use, Legalize and tax so that we are less worried about jails being filled with weed users instead of real felons and criminals

 @9FM9DVNRepublican from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DVDB23Republican from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DC9TVCConstitution from New Jersey  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only marijuana. No other drugs because they are more dangerous.

 @9D8S5QHRepublican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes but only for medical use and there should be stricter regulations on what is considered medical use

 Deletedanswered…3mos3MO

NO... Legalizing marijuana poses profound risks to moral formation, cultural clarity, and societal resilience. It violates the first principles of stewardship, virtue, and moral law by normalizing impairment as autonomy.

 @9ZDDJXSConstitution  from Texas  answered…11mos11MO

, yes, and immediately release anyone serving time or probation solely for personal drug use offenses Yes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it

 @9VVHHD6Republican  from New York  answered…12mos12MO

Yes, but create stricter laws on its use in public and the harms of its affects. e.g. smoking it while driving, air quality, etc. JUST like alcohol.

 @9V8MMZ7American Solidarity from Massachusetts  answered…1yr1Y

yes only on the condition that it is used to get rid of drug dealers and the money generated is used into theraputic and preventive care for addicatvies

 @9PR8T4CAmerican Solidarity from Connecticut  answered…1yr1Y

No, and there should be a return of social hygiene movements with an aim towards the medical treatment and eventual elimination of substance use

 @9MP23HJRepublican from Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

yes and no to be honest, yes i can see it for medical use but if its being used for anything else then no. but the guys and women that are locked up should be warned and let back on release its only fair.

 @9FQNDHRConstitution from Ohio  answered…2yrs2Y

State governments should be allowed to determine whether marijuana and other naturally growing narcotics are legal in their states

 @9D4Y7JBRepublican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but reduce protections regarding employment and criminal prosecution due to addiction.

 @9BN6Y6RAmerican Solidarity from Connecticut  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9CCBZYDRepublican from Oklahoma  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but limit its use to designated outdoor smoking areas away from buildings and people

 @9B5BV9ZConstitution from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

Phased legalization yes. But we need to be prepared for the social impact just like Alcoholism which is often used as an escape. We also need to way to identify intoxication to prevent death and danger on the road and when working. We also need to create a new level of abues programs and education. We could phase in reducing prison population related to Pot, however a 3rd party should be included since a dealer involved in theft or death that has pleaded down to possesion shoul dnot be in the same catagory as a guys busted with it in his possession.

 @95MGSH9Republican from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

I think States should be able to make their own laws, however the federal government should not federally legalize marijuana until they can test weather you are currently under the influence or not like you can alcohol.

 @94XKMJFRepublican from Kansas  answered…3yrs3Y

 @93MPHXHRepublican from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

Legalizing Marijuana is fine, tax it heavily. No different than alchohol

 @933DQMWRepublican from New Jersey  answered…3yrs3Y

We already have enough recreational drugs that exist. Most people don’t like smoking in any form, and it doesn’t matter whether it’s tobacco smoke or pot smoke that’s going into your lungs

 @92L4JBLConstitution from South Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

I guess it's okay to legal pot and treated like alcohol. And release anyone with pot related charges

 @8BH3JGVRepublican from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but is should only be a misdemeanor/result in a fine instead of imprisonment to reduce overcrowding

 @929VRQDRepublican from West Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @926G9Z7Republican from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but it should be decriminalized and release anyone serving time for its use

 @8ZF5VSQConstitution from Illinois  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and immediately release anyone serving time for JUST marijuana use/sell/grow. Not all drugs just marijuana use/grow/sell.

 @8Z68V54Republican from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but the owner will be responsible with it otherwise will be penalized

 @8XJ8DLZConstitution from Colorado  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, any naturally occurring "drug" (i.e. peyote, weed, etc) should be decriminalized. Manufactured "drugs" such as meth and crack should be classified as poisons with the selling and distribution of such treated as an attempt to physically harm another individual.

 @8WXSZ9FRepublican from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but tax and regulate marijuana as well as make it illegal in public and driving.

 @848VLCXAmerican Solidarity from Maryland  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8V9HBCWRepublicanfrom Guam  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8V5GWZ2Republicanfrom Guam  answered…4yrs4Y

Regardless, we should leave it to the states to decide the implementation

 @nmhoskinsConstitutionfrom Kansas  answered…4yrs4Y

This is a state-by-state issue to be resolved by the states, and not the federal government. The states would be stupid to make medical marijuana illegal though.

 @8TP9M9CRepublican from Maryland  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes and release anyone who has been charged with marijuana related charges

 @8TF8HXXRepublican from Connecticut  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TDHH8CAmerican Solidarity from Washington  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but criminal penalties for non-violent drug offenders should be drastically reduced

 @8T6ZXPBRepublican from Maine  answered…4yrs4Y

I do support legislation of Marijuana but I do not support the ridiculous taxation they put on it

 @8T4XLRKRepublican from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SVC468Republican from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

This issue should be decide at the State Level, but at a Federal Level, no.

 @8SV48CMRepublican from Illinois  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but discourage it heavily and allow private military contractors take bids to reduce the issue

 @8SBZKPBConstitution from Indiana  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes because capitalism it would be great for the economy, but I'm against taxing it because it is edible.

 @8S3RQV5Republican from Delaware  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but only after there's ways to test if someone is high while driving/ using heavy machinery

 @8RTH5PNConstitution from Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8RNN38CRepublican from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

I support decriminalization but those who are caught using it without a medical card will be sent to rehab. And dealers who are not either working for the gov. or don't have gov approval should be arrested.

 @8RFR7CSRepublican from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, and increase penalties for drug-related offenses other than possession (i.e. DUI, theft for drug money, any other drug-caused offense)

 @8RD6D8KConstitution from Missouri  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, because if people want to use that would be their choice and employers would be looking for employees that dont use

 @8QWZVWPRepublican from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but it needs to be regulated like cigarettes and alcohol, and it should be taxed the same as well, and release criminals who were charge with simple marijuana charges.

 @8QTHPC5Republican from Maryland  answered…5yrs5Y

Only for the critically ill people to ease their pain without using heavy drugs.

 @87MT4GHRepublican from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

I do not think this should be a federal issue. It should remain to the states.

 @8QCMYY7Republican from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8Q9GLTXRepublican from Tennessee  answered…5yrs5Y

If we are going to pick and choose what mood altering substances are “socially acceptable” we should legalize all of the drugs and have open access to treatment. Anyone addicted can get high quality long-term treatment for drug recovery that addresses why they use in the first place!

 @8PWZ6LZRepublican from Iowa  answered…5yrs5Y

Indifferent. Couldn't care less about what happens to the legalization of weed.

 @8NTWHQSRepublican from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but only for medical use, and the person has to be tested to see if they meet requirements for needing medical marijuana. Non medical use is still illegal and will need to show proof of needing it for medical purposes.

 @8M9X55BRepublican from Georgia  answered…5yrs5Y

 @TheMediatorRepublican from Delaware  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but this decisions should be left to the states, not the federal government.

 @8M78KQXRepublican from Kansas  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes but keep it out of the workplace. I don't want someone who's high operating a forklift or heavy machinery.

 @8KZVP4VRepublican from California  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8K9DLJ3Republican from Arizona  answered…5yrs5Y

Drug legalization is not a Constitutionally authorized function of the federal government.

 @wmrhinersonRepublicanfrom Florida  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, for medical purposes but it should be a state issue, not a federal one

 @8JGBHBMRepublican from Michigan  answered…5yrs5Y

I don´t care for it and the people were smoking it before it was legal anyways.

 @8J7TXLMAmerican Solidarity from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but I support the decriminalization of marijuana at the federal level and allowing for further research

 @8HMC5R3American Solidarity from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana; immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses.

 @8GY9Q62Republican from North Carolina  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8HCSB94Constitution from Idaho  answered…5yrs5Y

All drugs should be legalized / if you use without Dr issue than employers do not have to hire you insurance does not have to cover you

 @8H7FXF3Constitution from Indiana  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but only for medical use and never in public. It should be regulated the way alcohol is regulated, with similar laws limiting use during certain activities such as driving.

 @8G2TFSBRepublican from Illinois  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but only for legitimate medical conditions like cancer and glaucoma.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...