Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Expert Pundits

These active users have achieved advanced knowledge of the terminology, history, and legal implications regarding the topic of Climate Change

18.7k Replies

 @8C4Q6CXRepublican from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

c h i n a - We can do whatever we deem needed and productive, but we (The United States of America) are but a fraction of the world (and it's global environmental effects).

 @B2GS5G6No Labels from Texas  answered…4mos4MO

'Global Warming' is a money-laundering hoax. It's not real; though weather modification is through cloud seeding that was started I WW2. Ban that from our military.

 @9X87MKT from Texas  answered…7mos7MO

I'm good with incentives for energy production, but we aren't doing much good by making things more expensive for people

 @RWM1999Republican  from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but maintain an optimal number of regulations that don't impede on or stifle innovation and provide incentives for developing cleaner technologies

 @947F5KM from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TDMC2Y from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

No, they should find ways to make reliable resources such as coal gas oil and Nuclear, cleaner.

 @8R33X4T from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PL2W2Q from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

The government should encourage people to take extra precautions to care for our environment.

 @8PH822R from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Rarher than add more regulations, refine existing regulations to be more applicable. The goal is not to play God, but to do our best to limit emissions and encourage realistic and efficient companies to make cleaner products.

 @8MQRYMQ from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but give options to slowly opt. out from using things that will hurt the environment.

 @8KP8F3X from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

I believe this is a part of a two part question. The first being "can climate change be prevented?"

 @8HW7TLYRepublican from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

With more technological advances, we have decreased carbon emission. We also have incentives for renewable resources.

 @8G3BHVNLibertarian from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

The proper scientists and agencies that are not tied to corporate gain or political power should be in charge given the proper amount of data and research

 @RWM1999Republican from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but maintain an optimal number of regulations and provide incentives for clean technology development

 @RWM1999Republican from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but maintain an optimal number of regulations and provide incentives for developing cleaner technologies

 @RWM1999Republican from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

 @RWM1999Republican from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but keep some environmental regulations while providing more incentives for alternative energy at the same time

 @97B5D9M from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8Y2W5PY from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes but remove the carbon tax and tax not as clean energy and find a truly clean alternative energy and clean up all the water and air and land

 @8NM2LKPLibertarian from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8P98JT4 from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, tax carbon emissions and ramp down the subsidizing of the fossil fuel industry. Ramp up gas mileage regulations on automobiles.

  @8JBN6KV from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

First was called global warming, now climate change. This is an agenda. This is a war against carbon. I do not support the notion of climate change. It is mostly a hoax.

 @8P98JT4 from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes and No, tax carbon emissions and ramp down the subsidizing of the fossil fuel industry. Ramp up gas mileage regulations on automobiles.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...