criminals would still have access to the vast amount of guns that are in this country while the law abiding citizens would be without them.
Here are the top political news stories for today.
@BCY43RD17hrs17H
Azsxdcfvygubhinjom#Zw4xe5cr6vt7bynmobuedbiwncqoivdn c1oh ci1bd19n 29d2wn dc2909sk w9ui02dy0w 2ihdvoascgw[pkb 2 cp[2oixko d cudg1 dhc 2owodjbc-2 2-2v
@BCY6PRR16hrs16H
Exactly, criminals are criminals because they break the law, so if we take away the right for law abiding citizens to carry a gun it takes away their right to protect themselves and their families while the law breakers will find a way to have a gun and leave the law abiders without protection
@BCY82RMIndependent15hrs15H
Yes I agree. In fact, I think that the more civilians with guns will lower the crime rate because no one dares to commit violent crimes when they know their life could be threatened.
@BCY9PH514hrs14H
I agree guns are not what kill people people kill people. Take the UK for example they have a signfiicant rate of stabbings instead of gun violence and so violence still occurs. People kill people not guns.
@BCYC8ZFRepublican13hrs13H
I agree because in countries such as Australia, there was a shooting where guns aren't allowed but the bad person still had a gun.
@BCYGFWP12hrs12H
I agree, gun ownership in an area doesn’t necessarily mean higher crime rates. That is of course if those guns are owned legally
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.