Try the political quiz
+

6 Replies

 @BCY43RD from Michigan  agreed…17hrs17H

Azsxdcfvygubhinjom#Zw4xe5cr6vt7bynmobuedbiwncqoivdn c1oh ci1bd19n 29d2wn dc2909sk w9ui02dy0w 2ihdvoascgw[pkb 2 cp[2oixko d cudg1 dhc 2owodjbc-2 2-2v

 @BCY6PRR from Indiana  agreed…16hrs16H

Exactly, criminals are criminals because they break the law, so if we take away the right for law abiding citizens to carry a gun it takes away their right to protect themselves and their families while the law breakers will find a way to have a gun and leave the law abiders without protection

 @BCY82RMIndependent from Utah  agreed…15hrs15H

Yes I agree. In fact, I think that the more civilians with guns will lower the crime rate because no one dares to commit violent crimes when they know their life could be threatened.

 @BCY9PH5 from California  agreed…14hrs14H

I agree guns are not what kill people people kill people. Take the UK for example they have a signfiicant rate of stabbings instead of gun violence and so violence still occurs. People kill people not guns.

 @BCYC8ZFRepublican from Missouri  agreed…13hrs13H

I agree because in countries such as Australia, there was a shooting where guns aren't allowed but the bad person still had a gun.

 @BCYGFWP from Indiana  agreed…12hrs12H

I agree, gun ownership in an area doesn’t necessarily mean higher crime rates. That is of course if those guns are owned legally

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this disagreement.

Last activeActivity1 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias26%Audience bias19%Active inPartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown