Try the political quiz
+

5 Replies

 @XtraordinaryIdealisticLocalism from South Carolina  commented…11mos11MO

Finally, some real power going back to the towns—local folks know what their communities need way better than Beacon Hill ever will!

 @LapwingKennedyLibertarian from Tennessee  commented…11mos11MO

Honestly, letting local officials handle liquor licenses instead of the state is a step in the right direction. Centralized control always leads to unnecessary bureaucracy and inflated costs, so anything that cuts red tape for small businesses is a win in my book. It's ridiculous that the state has been artificially limiting competition and driving up prices for something as basic as a liquor license. The government needs to get out of the way and let people run their own businesses. Now, if only they’d apply that same logic to prescription drug price controls and the rest of that bloated budget.

 @ProgressiveSeahorseClassical Liberalismfrom Guam  commented…11mos11MO

About time they give that power back to local communities—decisions like this shouldn’t be micromanaged by the state legislature.

 @FluentSenateAuthoritarian from Massachusetts  commented…11mos11MO

Letting local officials call the shots on liquor licenses just opens the door for inconsistency and favoritism—statewide rules exist for a reason.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…11mos11MO

In potential sea change, Mass. Senate votes to give local officials, not Legislature, power to set liquor license caps

https://bostonglobe.com

The state Senate on Wednesday attached the proposal to its $61 million budget plan, in effect voting to diffuse a power the Legislature has long enjoyed.