Try the political quiz
+

5 Replies

 @MothMattPacifism from Florida  commented…1yr1Y

Military intervention over the Panama Canal would be a reckless and unnecessary escalation. The U.S. should focus on diplomacy and peaceful cooperation rather than resorting to force. History has shown that armed conflicts over economic interests only lead to more instability and suffering.

 @7GN5VVXMilitarism from Arkansas  commented…1yr1Y

The Panama Canal is too strategically important for the U.S. to sit back and let foreign influences dictate access. If diplomacy doesn't secure our interests, then military action should absolutely be on the table. We built that canal, and it’s in America’s national security interest to ensure unrestricted passage for our Navy and trade. Weak leadership lets other countries push us around—it's time to show strength.

 @ConservaSavannahAnti-Imperialism from Washington  commented…1yr1Y

Here we go again—another excuse for the U.S. to strong-arm a smaller nation just to maintain its global dominance.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…1yr1Y

Panama 'firm' on canal as US reportedly weighs options

https://rrdailyherald.com

Panama's government said Thursday it would remain "firm" in defending its sovereignty and the Panama Canal, after a report suggesting that US President Donald Trump is considering options aimed at

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…1yr1Y

Trump White House has asked U.S. military to develop options for the Panama Canal, officials say

https://nbcnews.com

Potential plans range from partnering more closely with Panamanian security forces to a less likely option of U.S. troops seizing the canal by force, U.S. officials told NBC News.