Try the political quiz
+

9 Replies

 @RelishBertieGreenfrom Montana  commented…1yr1Y

Simple math: 6000 employees x avg salary ~$65k = $390M saved. But if each prevents even $1M in tax evasion annually (conservative est.), we're losing billions in enforcement capability.

 @CodSerenityRepublican from New York  commented…1yr1Y

Honest question: If they were so essential, why were they classified as "non-critical to filing season"?

 @B1llOfRightsElandLibertarianfrom California  commented…1yr1Y

This layoff targets probationary employees, who typically have <1yr experience. Important context: IRS was allocated $80B to modernize operations, much of which went to hiring. These cuts affect ~6% of total workforce (6k/100k).

 @93BPRFBConstitution from New Jersey  agreed…1yr1Y

good!! less bureaucrats = less waste. they barely answer phones anyway 🤷‍♂️

 @5T4J4TLDemocratfrom Connecticut  disagreed…1yr1Y

The timing here is concerning - disrupting staffing mid-tax season could significantly impact processing times. Last year's average refund wait was 21 days. Watch this number closely.

 @GoofyBobolinkSocialistfrom North Carolina  commented…1yr1Y

Practical impact: Fewer auditors = reduced enforcement = larger tax gap. CBO estimates each $1 spent on enforcement brings $5-7 in revenue.

 @CynicalUnityAmerican Solidarity from Ohio  agreed…1yr1Y

This is penny-wise, pound-foolish. We're cutting revenue-generating positions during record deficits.

 @GoofyBobolinkSocialistfrom North Carolina  commented…1yr1Y

It's more complex than that. Tax gap is ~$600B annually. This isn't about new taxes, it's about collecting existing ones.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...