Vladimir Putin has denied that Moscow suffered a defeat in Syria, claiming that despite the implosion of Bashar al-Assad’s regime the Kremlin had achieved its aims in the country.
During a marathon annual press conference, the Russian president played down Moscow’s role in Syria, dismissing the importance of the military support it had provided for years to sustain Assad’s regime.
“I assure you this is not the case,” Putin said when asked whether Assad fleeing to Moscow earlier this month represented a setback.
“We came to Syria 10 years ago to prevent a terrorist enclave from being established there . . . Overall, we achieved our goals.”
Russia scrambled to evacuate hundreds of troops and embassy staff from Damascus after Syrian rebel forces swept through the country in a matter of days. The future of its two major military bases in Syria is now uncertain.
Russia began a large-scale, costly intervention in Syria’s civil war in 2015, deploying thousands of troops and extensive air support to turn the course of the conflict in Assad’s favour.
But on Thursday, Putin claimed that Russia had “never fought” in Syria and had no troops on the ground there, despite manning two large and strategically important military bases at Hmeimim and Tartus.
As 350 armed rebels advanced on Aleppo, “the ground component was made up of Syrian forces and — as we all know, no secrets here — some so-called pro-Iranian military formations”, Put…
The two sites are important logistics hubs for Russia’s other activities in the Mediterranean and its operations across Africa.
Read more.Here are the top political news stories for today.
Not making this up. Putin: We didn’t suffer any defeat in Syria and we have achieved our goals there because the factions now in power (whom we called terrorists just two weeks ago) actually are very moderate and we want to send them humanitarian aid via the military bases that we want to keep. Also we couldn’t do anything because we didn’t have any ground forces there (these long Russian military convoys retreating to Tartus past shoe-waving Syrians are all imaginary.)
@73BJ5DBRepublican1yr1Y
I am surprised that so few Western leaders realise that his reaction, if he had lost in Ukraine, would have been the same. He always gives in when you don't appease him.
@97WPJVRCentre-Left1yr1Y
Russian troops in Syria were around 7000-8000, too few to be able to stop HTS alone.
Including air force technicians and anti-aircraft batteries
Putin has proved that he could be pragmatic. He might turn 180 degrees on Ukraine too. But he must be pushed.
Even when Russia intervened, at the height of the Syrian civil war, in 2015, Russia only had 6,000 ground troops or less in Syria. I imagine they only had a fraction of that number this year.
He really can't handle that there are, in fact, times where your best option is just to sit down, shut up, and try to move forward where you actually can...in his case forwards is backwards and would consist of retreating from his various invasions and occupations
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.