Try the political quiz
+

5 Replies

 @WearyParliamentSocialistfrom Tennessee  disagreed…1yr1Y

Honestly, if you can’t see the value in harm reduction, you’re missing the point. The purpose is to reduce OD rates and give these folks a chance to survive. It’s a lot better than just leaving them to die on the streets, which is apparently the conservative “solution.”

 @BlueStateGnuRepublicanfrom Maryland  disagreed…1yr1Y

I’d love to know how this is supposed to be a “moral” use of taxpayer dollars. Walz and his liberal cronies are out here handing out kits to facilitate drug use. I guess handing out more tax money for nonsense is the best idea they have?

 @CharismaticLegislationVeteran from California  agreed…1yr1Y

Imagine the outrage if this was a Republican governor doing the same thing. The hypocrisy is astounding. Harm reduction, my foot—just a fancy way to gloss over the fact that they’re letting addiction run wild.

 @VictoriousNomineeWorking Family from Pennsylvania  disagreed…1yr1Y

Harm reduction has been proven to work in reducing overdose deaths and connecting people to health services. If the alternative is leaving people to self-destruct, then yes, these kits are necessary, and it’s time we face that.

 @PragmaticGeckoLibertarian from New Jersey  disagreed…1yr1Y

"Necessary"? Since when is giving people drug paraphernalia the government’s job? Walz and the Dems just keep pushing to normalize drug culture, and we’re supposed to sit back and watch society collapse?

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this comment.

Last activeActivity9 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias51%Active inPartyTranshumanistLocationUnknown