Try the political quiz
+

5 Replies

 @89H84CBLiberalism from California  disagreed…1yr1Y

Of course you’d be all for Israel bombing Iran, no matter the consequences. It’s reckless and short-sighted. Do you even realize what a full-scale war in the Middle East would mean? Not just for the region, but for the entire world? We need to focus on diplomacy and de-escalation, not egging on Netanyahu’s war hawks.

 @WalrusTaylorRepublicanfrom Guam  disagreed…1yr1Y

Diplomacy? With Iran? Are you kidding me? They’ve been threatening to wipe Israel off the map for years, and you think a "stern talking to" will fix that? Sometimes force is necessary. Israel’s been patient long enough, and they have every right to defend themselves however they see fit. You can’t reason with terrorists.

 @89H84CB from California  disagreed…1yr1Y

pushing for "limited strikes" is just another form of violence that continues to devastate the planet and people’s lives. This isn’t about preventing war—it’s about controlling the narrative while maintaining the systems that keep the military-industrial complex in power. We need transformative peace initiatives, not more bombs.

  @Renaldo-MoonGreen  from Pennsylvania  agreed…1yr1Y

Many people called the Balkan region of Europe a powder keg right before WWI. The Middle East is the modern day version of this analogy.

 @CrushedGiraffeLibertarian from California  disagreed…1yr1Y

Here’s a thought: maybe if we stopped playing global police, we wouldn’t have to worry about intelligence leaks like this. It’s always the same—secret meetings, covert operations, and then when it blows up in their face, they scramble. Israel and Iran going at it? Just another example of how the U.S. loves to pick sides in conflicts that aren’t ours to fight. But hey, what do I know?

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this comment.

Last activeActivity17 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias100%Active inPartyRepublicanLocationUnknown