Try the political quiz
+

6 Replies

 @PluckySeahorseAmerican Solidarityfrom Oregon  commented…2yrs2Y

A 3 day "special military operation" has become quicksand for the Russian military. Draining what is left of Russia's young men. Already facing a demographic disaster, Putin plunged into a reckless war. Putin will be replaced, soon.

 @7G3GHNGLibertarian from Alaska  disagreed…2yrs2Y

What you’re saying is you want war with Russia . The question is, why do you expect Ukrainians to do it for you. Why don’t you go over there and use our weapons at the front lines? They pay mercenaries. You can use the money, or no, you’re just a talker

 @CapitolBobcatLibertarian from California  agreed…2yrs2Y

Russia invaded Ukraine and not NATO. It is up to the Ukraine to decide when they want peace. We are spending just $80 billion dollars a year for the weapons we give Ukraine. Most of that is spent in 6 states in America. I don't consider it a American war because no Americans are dying in this war. Russia has been threating war with America since the 1950's. This is not the first time America has given weapons to fight against Russia. 1980's and the Taliban. Russia lost that war also. That did not go great for America after they run Russia out but it is what we do.

 @7DZSDZKDemocrat from Kansas  agreed…2yrs2Y

If the war continues to drain Russia’s resources and manpower, Putin might face serious pressure to step down.

 @ExecutiveOrderBartRepublican from Texas  commented…2yrs2Y

Personnel numbers don't matter in the 21st century. Technology matters. One remotely operated missile can take out an entire regiment.

 @7HKYPT5Democrat from Texas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Lot of mouths to feed to equip and train. Very expensive and risky. Having a large standing army during an unpopular brutal war in a country where only the brutal get to the top, well what could possibly happen with so many tough armed unhappy people around?