Anything Zelensky had to say Thursday at the close of the NATO summit in Washington was overshadowed by President Biden's verbal flub where he introduced the Ukrainian leader as "President Putin".
But among the more interesting statements of Zelensky was the demand for his Western backers, especially the US, to lift all restrictions on arms used to attack inside Russian territory.
"If we want to win, if we want to prevail, if we want to save our country and to defend it, we need to lift all the limitations," Zelensky said while standing alongside NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg in the summit's closing session.
The Ukrainian president argued that this is crucial for "having Ukraine on the map" and not allowing Russia to "attack half of the planet."
"That is a crazy question why we can’t answer and attack these… military bases from where these guided bombs from jets or missiles came, targeted us and killed our children," Zelensky continued, clearly criticizing his own more powerful backers.
So far the White House has greenlighted using US-weapons against Russian territory from which its forces are attacking, thus confining strikes to not far inside Russia's border.
President Biden at his evening press conference responded to Zelensky's words, based on a reporter's question, and showed an unwillingness to change policy (at least for now) based on Kiev's demands.
Referencing his national security and defense advisers, Biden said:
"If he had the capacity to strike Moscow, strike the Kremlin, would that make sense?" Biden said of Zelenskyy.
He later added, "We’re making it on a day-to-day basis... how far they should go in" to Russian territory.
Thus he did acknowledge that this dangerous, escalatory policy which threatens to draw Washington directly into the fight could change at any moment.
.Here are the top political news stories for today.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
How would you feel if your country supported foreign military actions that could escalate into a larger conflict?
@9QWHKKNIndependent2yrs2Y
I would absolutely not support this. What if China gave Mexico ballistic missles and allowed them to launch those missles into the US. We (the US) would immediately go to war with China over such actions. This is especially dire when dealing with a nuclear armed country, whose leader is already paranoid about US interventionism. This can only lead to a spiraling into a global conflict that could result in nuclear holocaust. The US, really needs to work on deescalation and peace. Especially since WE are the cause of Russia invading Ukraine.
I would be hesitant unless there was a broader ethical issue.
@9QWDMS7Libertarian2yrs2Y
I think it is a terrible idea we are worried about a war that has been going on for years and now that its in full scale we want to dump all of this money into Ukraine when they have done little to nothing for us besides ask for more and more money. It isn't our war. We could do so much more for our people here at home. The homeless, the veterans suffering, low-income families, and so much more.
I’m not sure why he wants to escalate more.
I understand wanting to defend your sovereignty, but you will not get much support from the west if you escalate and risk nuclear war
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
Is it justifiable for a nation to attack beyond its borders in defense of its sovereignty and safety?
@9QWC6HF 2yrs2Y
I mean yeah Russia DID attack them first with no good reason and has stated they want to take over Ukraine for no other reason than land, and they annexed Crimea in 2016 for no other reason than oil and agriculture
@PieFrankieRepublican2yrs2Y
so funny how countries cant make their own decisions without Dad's permission
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
Join in on more popular conversations.