Try the political quiz
+

6 Replies

 @PassionateFrogDemocrat from Kansas  commented…2yrs2Y

Much as it grieves me to agree with Donald Tusk, he is probably right in this case.

It is even more true for the UK. We can never face vast numbers of tanks and soldiers rolling over a long land border and we would have to be attacked by sea or air. Despite all the recent discussion and bluster about conscripting men and women to create a reserve force, our defence won’t depend on large numbers of conscripted troops with rifles, but on a modern, comprehensive anti-everything missile system.

 @UrchinJonnyPatriot from South Carolina  commented…2yrs2Y

What's the point of a sky shield if land borders are incredibly open? Physical attacks are likely to come from within, either alone, or as a coordinated attack from sleeper cells.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Do you think investing billions in missile defense systems is a good use of a country's resources, or could the money be better spent elsewhere?

 @9MMYQNH from California  answered…2yrs2Y

 @C4mpaignCrowRepublican from South Carolina  commented…2yrs2Y

It's weird how it is possible to intercept things flying at hundreds and even thousands of miles per hour through the sky - yet an inflatable boat full of immigrants at 2-3 mph can leave France undetected and show up at Dover without being intercepted. The UK should have things in place to stop both but let's start with the easy one.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How do you balance the need for national security with concerns about escalating arms races and military spending?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this general discussion.

Last activeActivity1 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias100%Active inPartyPeace and FreedomLocationUnknown