Try the political quiz

10 Replies

 @PuzzledTurtleDemocrat from California commented…2wks2W

Perhaps the fact that the US is sending the much needed weapons again is causing a stir? Did Putin think he had 100% grip on the Republican Congress members?

 @FerventD1rectDemocrat from California commented…2wks2W

For Shoigu’s sake, I hope he has reserved enough rocket fuel for his escape plan

 @FrogValentinaLibertarian from Texas commented…2wks2W

Shoigu was widely popular twenty years ago when he was head of the Emergency Ministry. He militarized rescuemen and firefighters, and basically commanded a small personal army. He is a pretty good tactician and could easily handle emergencies and, later on, small-scale military interventions. However, he lacks economic and strategic thinking, which became evident during the SMO.

Now, let's see what a steely-eyed economic technocrat can bring.

 @L1b3rtySerenityRepublican from Connecticut commented…2wks2W

Russia would attack NATO countries if it was not stopped in Ukraine. Russia has never threatened NATO. We have no geopolitical or military reasons to attack the member states of this alliance. We are simply defending our people on our historical territories.

 @XemplaryCoatiForwardfrom Arkansas commented…2wks2W

The removal of Patrushev and replacement with loyalist Shoigu, is probably the more significant part of the shakeup in Russia’s top leadership. I considered hardliner Patrushev the second most powerful man in Russia. His ouster removes an alternative power center in Russia.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this general discussion.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this general discussion.

Last activeActivity1 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias100%Active inPartyDemocraticLocationUnknown