Try the political quiz
+

26 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

If you discovered your nation was secretly aiding another country in a conflict, would it change your perception of your government and why?

 @9LSLGPTRepublican from Oregon  answered…2yrs2Y

I dont think it would change my perception of my government, because I would go along with their idea. I would think its the best for us.

 @9LSNNX5 from Louisiana  disagreed…2yrs2Y

If I felt that the nation shouldn't be helping another country or involve themselves in anothers affairs than I would not support their effort.

 @9LSLLHPfrom Guam  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes because the government has a history of starting and perpetuating forever wars against the will of the people and without congressional approval, then lying about it. They have proven themselves untrustworthy.

 @9LSMBGJ from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9LSLQVL from Hawaii  answered…2yrs2Y

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

What do you think about the ethical implications of one country secretly supplying advanced military technology to another?

 @9LSN6MW from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9LSN72G from Idaho  answered…2yrs2Y

I think it is moraliy questionable and such actions should be under scrintiny by the people

 @9LSLK2N from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9LSLQVL from Hawaii  answered…2yrs2Y

 @QuailEmiliaGreen from Wisconsin  commented…2yrs2Y

Great we find this out one day after the Senate passed the new aid bill.

 @HarmoniousWalrusLibertarianfrom Maine  agreed…2yrs2Y

This was kept secret so the dangers of more aid to Ukraine would not be made evident to the US public

 @R3gulationXerusLibertarianfrom Texas  agreed…2yrs2Y

This was kept secret so the dangers of more aid to Ukraine would not be made evident to the US public

 @WorriedCicadaDemocrat from Arizona  commented…2yrs2Y

“Secretly”.

They already sent ATACMS many times before, they already had drawndown authority unspent. It wasn’t secret it was already approved.

This is clickbait.

 @JaguarZoeTranshumanist from Indiana  disagreed…2yrs2Y

They sent the 300km range version. The previous version was 165km. Nice half truth.

 @GerrymanderArtGreenfrom Maine  commented…2yrs2Y

Long range missiles that can hit into Russian territory is a provocative move. All for defensive equipment. Offensive equipment harder to justify, IMHO.

 @SparrowBenMountain from Virginia  disagreed…2yrs2Y

 @CivilRightsMonkeyLibertarian from New Jersey  commented…2yrs2Y

So essentially, the aid wasn’t approved and us did it anyway. Our constitution is considered irrelevant by govt officials

 @RabbitJimmyPatriotfrom Michigan  commented…2yrs2Y

When Speaker Johnson was photographed at Mar-a-Lago earlier this month, I assumed Putin would be popping champagne in Kyiv by June 1. Long-term forecast for Ukraine looks decidedly better, but still a lot of work to do.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Should the public be informed about their government's involvement in international military operations, or are some secrets necessary for national security?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Considering the risks of escalation in international conflicts, do you believe countries should intervene with military support in conflicts outside their borders?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How would you feel if your country was involved in secretly sending weapons to another country involved in a conflict?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...