Try the political quiz
+

9 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How does the idea of being watched by nearly 500 cameras around your city make you feel about your personal freedom and privacy?

 @9L7M89W  from California  commented…2yrs2Y

If it stops crimes in action or provides prosecutable evidence, I am for it. Private and gated communities have it so why not all?

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

Newsom to install nearly 500 cameras in Oakland as crime surges

https://justthenews.com

Crime has surged in Oakland in recent years, resulting in business closures and private action by the town's major employees to protect employees

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

Newsom Announces Contract to Install Nearly 500 High-Tech Surveillance Cameras in and Around Oakland

https://kqed.org

The plan comes as part of a push to fight a rise in crime in the city — but critics worry the cameras violate residents’ civil rights.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

Gov. Newsom to deploy 500 surveillance cameras to Oakland to battle crime

https://cbsnews.com

Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday announced that hundreds of high-tech surveillance cameras would be installed in the city of Oakland and surrounding freeways to fight crime.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Do you believe the government has the right to monitor public spaces extensively if it means making those spaces safer for everyone?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

If installing more surveillance cameras could significantly reduce crime but also potentially infringe on privacy, where do you draw the line between safety and privacy?

 @PieKenfrom Maine  commented…2yrs2Y

I'm all for making our communities safer, but this heavy-handed surveillance approach feels like a missed opportunity to address the root causes of crime in Oakland. Pumping resources into surveillance tech without parallel investments in social programs, education, and economic development seems short-sighted. Genuine safety comes from community strength and support, not just watching and recording everyone's every move.

 @EcstaticDemocratic from California  commented…2yrs2Y

While I understand the concerns about Oakland's rising crime, this surveillance initiative sounds like a slippery slope towards a surveillance state. It's crucial we find a balance between ensuring public safety and respecting individual privacy rights, rather than just plastering the city with cameras.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...