The Online Harms Act, or Bill C-63 increases the potential penalties from five years to life imprisonment.
It also increases the penalty for the willful promotion of hatred (a dangerously ill-defined crime) from two years to five years. The proposed changes constitute a doubling down on Canada’s commitment to reducing free speech for citizens despite criticism from many in the civil liberties community.
There is also a chilling option for house arrest if a judge believes a defendant “will commit” an offense. In other words, if a judge thinks that a citizen will be undeterred and try to speak freely again.
Justice Minister Arif Virani employed the same hysteria to convince citizens to surrender their freedoms to the government. He expressed how terrified he was with the potential of free speech, stating that he is “terrified of the dangers that lurk on the internet for our children.”
It is not likely to end there. Today the rationale is genocide. However, once the new penalties are in place, a host of other groups will demand similar treatment for those with opposing views on their own causes. This law already increased the penalties for anything deemed hateful speech.
The law comes after Canada blocked a Russian dissident from becoming a citizen because of her violation of Russian anti-free speech laws. In a telling act, the government said that the same conduct (i.e., free speech) could be a crime in Canada.
Indeed, it may now be punished even more harshly.
.Here are the top political news stories for today.
I’m more concerned on the lack of pushback from Canadian conservatives on this. When it matters most, where is the opposition?
The true conservative leaders are currently living in exile in Up-State New York and the Northern States of the US, trying to escape imprisonment from Trudeau's Evil Police.
@Unit3dNationsMiaPatriot2yrs2Y
Canada is a single party state, "the crown", composed of a bevy of volunteer organizations they purport are individual political parties but who subscribe to an 18th century British Whig interpretation of "democracy" where total insulation of power from the people is perfection.
Justin Trudeau is a store of evil.
He should be put in jail.
And executed
@9CJ6CB62yrs2Y
Nah, death penalty should’ve been abolished a long time ago. Sure, let some people rot in jail, but death doesn’t scare a lot of people, and can actually make them commit worse crimes if they know they’ll be caught. Besides, even Catherine the Great tried to get rid of it, and that was in the 1800s.
@BB3X67H 2mos2MO
I disagree. The idea of death is much more deep than being in jail around other humans. I believe the death penalty not only frees the world of people who don’t deserve life, but also is a good bargaining tool to set people straight before it’s too late for them.
Worthless, degenerate scumbags who murder people, in attacking the right of life of others, have renounced their own, and thus deserve the full punishment of the law.
@9CJ6CB62yrs2Y
Functionally speaking, it’s not a great idea. Morally, it’s a grey area, but I’d let those criminals stay in prison, a lower quality prison, sure, but someone murdering someone else does not excuse us committing it in turn. An eye for an eye just makes the whole world blind, and it does nothing for justice, the sanctity of life, or for the families of those murdered themselves. The best way to deal with crime is to increase the certainty of punishment, not the severity. If everyone knew they’d get caught, and be sentenced to prison, then doing the crime sounds a lot… Read more
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
Do you think the government should have the power to predict and punish future speech crimes?
@9KWY34X2yrs2Y
No, Freedom of speech is one of the first rights mentioned in the Constitution, and people should not be punished for their opinions or wording.
@9KWXVNJ2yrs2Y
No, because that's taking away the first amendment
Canada doesn't have the first amendment. But it is taking away our God-given right to Liberty.
@9CJ6CB62yrs2Y
@OctopusHaileyNo Labels2yrs2Y
@DeerBradyRepublican2yrs2Y
The same ideology is currently dominant in D.C. They want us to be that we chose them.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
How would you feel if expressing your opinion on social media could lead to a life sentence?
@Grognard28 1yr1Y
I would stay off of social media and pray for things to return to normal.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.