
An Alabama Supreme Court’s ruling that frozen embryos in test tubes should be considered children has sent shock waves through the world of reproductive medicine, casting doubt over fertility care for would-be parents in the state and raising complex legal questions with implications extending far beyond Alabama.
The judges issued the ruling on Friday in appeals cases brought by couples whose embryos were destroyed in 2020, when a hospital patient removed frozen embryos from tanks of liquid nitrogen in Mobile and dropped them on the floor.
Referencing antiabortion language in the state constitution, the judges’ majority opinion said that an 1872 statute allowing parents to sue over the wrongful death of a minor child applies to “unborn children,” with no exception for “extrauterine children.”
“Even before birth, all human beings have the image of God, and their lives cannot be destroyed without effacing his glory,” Chief Justice Tom Parker wrote in a concurring opinion.
Couples in the midst of grueling and costly infertility treatments in Alabama said they were overwhelmed with questions and concerns, and some said they feared their providers would be forced to close their clinics.
“The embryos to me are our best chance at having children, and we are extremely hopeful,” Ms. Legerski said. “But having three embryos in the freezer is not the same to me as having one that implants and become a pregnancy, and it’s not the same as having a child.
“We have three embryos. We don’t have three children.”
Reproductive medicine scientists also blasted the ruling, saying it was a “medically and scientifically unfounded decision.”
“The court held that a fertilized frozen egg in a fertility clinic freezer should be treated as the legal equivalent of an existent child or a fetus gestating in a womb,” said Dr. Paula Amato, the president of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
“Science and everyday common sense tell us they are not,” she said. Even in the natural world, she added, several eggs are often fertilized before one successfully implants in the uterus and results in a pregnancy.
Here are the top political news stories for today.
Using your own personal faith to make rulings on people who don’t agree with your beliefs is unacceptable. You may think we are all created in gods image ( or whatever) but I do not believe that. This is a frightening and dangerous situation.
@Bip4rtisanTigerGreen2yrs2Y
Let's be honest about which faith we're talking about here: fundamentalist, Evangelical Christianity. I don't see a state supreme court making this ruling if their majority are Reform Jews or Unitarians.
@L1beralLeoForward2yrs2Y
I agree completely. In this country no laws should be passed based on religious beliefs, it's in our Constitution. No one can say for sure that their religion is the only true religion. There is not a living person that can truthfully say that. We are not a Theocracy, no matter what the Religiuous Right wants the public to believe and we have the Constitution to protect us from that possibility.
Why? Did they rule that Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and Mormons can't worship as they please? No! Did they establish a government-funded Church that everyone has to go to? No! So no, they did nothing to encroach on the religious liberty of non-Christians. And besides, Christianity is the only logical possibility – why not base such momentous decisions on the only logical possibility? I can explain if anyone who's offended by this comment responds – but prepare to get philosophical.
@ThriftyDiplomacyGreen2yrs2Y
When will Alabama courts grant personhood to women?
When judges rely on their book of faith for legal support and reasoning they break the basic promise of the 1st Amendment by seeking to use government power to impose their beliefs on all citizens. I have little faith in the Supreme Court or the Congress to correct this glaring imposition of one groups religious beliefs on their fellow citizens. A storm is brewing in this country and I wonder if we will still be a union in 50 years.
@L1beralChrisDemocrat2yrs2Y
“Even before birth, all human beings have the image of God, and their lives cannot be destroyed without effacing his glory.”
Tom Parker, the Chief Justice of Alabama’s Supreme Court wrote that sentence.
Has he not heard of the separation of church and state?
If embryos are children, will the parents (the ova and sperm donors) be able to take dependent tax deductions and child tax credits for each one of the 10 to 20 of them? Is there joint custody if the parents aren't married to each other? All that would be difficult with anonymous sperm donors. Do they need social security numbers (although you can't tell the tiny litte ones apart by looking at them under the microscope)? Do storage facilities for frozen embryos count as childcare facilities? What happens when several are implanted (the usual practice) but not all of them survive (as usual)? Will that be considered negligence or trigger any other draconian anti-women's reproductive health care laws? This Alabama decision was not very well thought out.
@MeerkatAlfieDemocrat2yrs2Y
As a physician I am increasingly appalled, enraged, and frightened for my patients and for my colleagues. These doctors and patients have no way to know what will become of the specter of these rulings and associated legal threats hanging over them as they try to proceed with their medical care. As another commenter said, there is no doubt that rulings like these will slowly contribute to the drain of high-quality, ethical, open-minded, empathetic physicians from states like Alabama and Texas. What a nightmare. Please, everyone, VOTE.
as a law professional, where does it stop? I’m a republican, but I’m also a woman, and I’d really like have access to healthcare instead of a political platform.
@SmeltJoshGreen2yrs2Y
Maybe you shouldn’t have voted for Republicans?It was obvious where they were going with reproductive freedom for the last 30 years at least
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.