Try the political quiz
+

18 Replies

 @ArtisticCougarWomen’s Equality from Tennessee  commented…2yrs2Y

Using your own personal faith to make rulings on people who don’t agree with your beliefs is unacceptable. You may think we are all created in gods image ( or whatever) but I do not believe that. This is a frightening and dangerous situation.

 @Bip4rtisanTigerGreenfrom Maine  commented…2yrs2Y

Let's be honest about which faith we're talking about here: fundamentalist, Evangelical Christianity. I don't see a state supreme court making this ruling if their majority are Reform Jews or Unitarians.

 @ArtisticCougarWomen’s Equality from Tennessee  commented…2yrs2Y

Evangelicals think there's only one right way. Their way.

Never mind that among them, they can't even agree on a definition of heaven.

 @L1beralLeoForwardfrom Maine  commented…2yrs2Y

I agree completely. In this country no laws should be passed based on religious beliefs, it's in our Constitution. No one can say for sure that their religion is the only true religion. There is not a living person that can truthfully say that. We are not a Theocracy, no matter what the Religiuous Right wants the public to believe and we have the Constitution to protect us from that possibility.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  commented…2yrs2Y

Engaged Abortion

According to Amendment X of the Constitution, all powers not delegated to the federal government are reserved for the people of the states, making this a state sovereignty issue. Regardless of how you feel about Alabama's decision, there was nothing unconstitutional about it.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  commented…2yrs2Y

Engaged Abortion

Why? Did they rule that Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and Mormons can't worship as they please? No! Did they establish a government-funded Church that everyone has to go to? No! So no, they did nothing to encroach on the religious liberty of non-Christians. And besides, Christianity is the only logical possibility – why not base such momentous decisions on the only logical possibility? I can explain if anyone who's offended by this comment responds – but prepare to get philosophical.

 @ThriftyDiplomacyGreen from New York  commented…2yrs2Y

When will Alabama courts grant personhood to women?

 @BlissfulChamoisSocialist from New York  commented…2yrs2Y

When judges rely on their book of faith for legal support and reasoning they break the basic promise of the 1st Amendment by seeking to use government power to impose their beliefs on all citizens. I have little faith in the Supreme Court or the Congress to correct this glaring imposition of one groups religious beliefs on their fellow citizens. A storm is brewing in this country and I wonder if we will still be a union in 50 years.

 @L1beralChrisDemocrat from Texas  commented…2yrs2Y

“Even before birth, all human beings have the image of God, and their lives cannot be destroyed without effacing his glory.”

Tom Parker, the Chief Justice of Alabama’s Supreme Court wrote that sentence.

Has he not heard of the separation of church and state?

 @BoldDeerDemocrat from Pennsylvania  commented…2yrs2Y

If embryos are children, will the parents (the ova and sperm donors) be able to take dependent tax deductions and child tax credits for each one of the 10 to 20 of them? Is there joint custody if the parents aren't married to each other? All that would be difficult with anonymous sperm donors. Do they need social security numbers (although you can't tell the tiny litte ones apart by looking at them under the microscope)? Do storage facilities for frozen embryos count as childcare facilities? What happens when several are implanted (the usual practice) but not all of them survive (as usual)? Will that be considered negligence or trigger any other draconian anti-women's reproductive health care laws? This Alabama decision was not very well thought out.

 @CruelSpecialInterestGreenfrom Texas  commented…2yrs2Y

Alabama" and "well-thought out" two fragments of a sentence that have never went together, lol

 @MeerkatAlfieDemocrat from Colorado  commented…2yrs2Y

As a physician I am increasingly appalled, enraged, and frightened for my patients and for my colleagues. These doctors and patients have no way to know what will become of the specter of these rulings and associated legal threats hanging over them as they try to proceed with their medical care. As another commenter said, there is no doubt that rulings like these will slowly contribute to the drain of high-quality, ethical, open-minded, empathetic physicians from states like Alabama and Texas. What a nightmare. Please, everyone, VOTE.

 @PuddingVictoriaRepublican from Illinois  commented…2yrs2Y

as a law professional, where does it stop? I’m a republican, but I’m also a woman, and I’d really like have access to healthcare instead of a political platform.

 @SmeltJoshGreenfrom California  commented…2yrs2Y

Maybe you shouldn’t have voted for Republicans?It was obvious where they were going with reproductive freedom for the last 30 years at least

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  commented…2yrs2Y

Engaged Abortion

"Reproductive freedom" is just a far-Left code-word for the Holocaust of the Unborn we call abortion.

 @OptimisticNarwhalSocialist from Maryland  agreed…2yrs2Y

I do not understand how anyone who values freedom can be a Republican. I honestly cannot wrap my head around it.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Do you agree with considering embryos as children based on potential for life, or should the actual current state of development be the determining factor?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

If frozen embryos are considered children, to what extent do you believe this should affect couples seeking in vitro fertilization treatments?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this general discussion.

Last activeActivity1 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias18%Audience bias17%Active inPartyUndeclaredLocationMinneapolis, MN