The following is a 3 message exchange between 2 users
@9FZKSH6 2yrs2Y
The Constitution protects the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, to us and our posterity.
To pose a question:
If it is considered a double-homicide to kill a pregnant woman, why then, do some states disregard this human life in the case of an abortion?
@9FZLZK62yrs2Y
There is a difference between voluntary and involuntary erasure of life. If an embryo can not survive outside of the womb (months 1-3) then it is not a full life and should be up to the parents determination to continue with its existence or not.
@9FZKSH6 2yrs2Y
"there is a diferance between volentary and involentary erasure of life." -Your quote. I agree.
In this quote, you are already accepting that the unborn is alive: you end the sentence with referring to the baby as "life."
However, you make a contradiction in your argument. After originally referring to the "embryo" as a life in the first sentence, you continue in your second sentence to say that "if an embryo can not survive outside of the womb (months 1-3) then it is not a full life...".
This is false, because to assume that something is not fully alive,… Read more
Join in on more popular conversations.