Congress passed the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act (STOCK Act) in 2012, following more than 10 years of allegations of insider trading by members of Congress and staff. Initially introduced in 2006, Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) and Rep. Brian Baird (D-WA) drafted the STOCK Act in response to insider trading allegations against Tony Rudy, a top aide to the onetime House Majority Leader Rep. Tom DeLay, as well as an insider trading scandal faced by Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist in 2005. Critics argue that The STOCK Act has failed to achieve its goal of penalizing members for…
Read moreNarrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Voting for candidate:
@9TVSQYTLibertarian8mos8MO
No, a civil service retirement program and investment option like the TSP should be enforced for all government employees until they are done with their political career.
@9MBMV6CLibertarian1yr1Y
No; their investments should be held in a blind trust, more must be done to prevent insider trading by their friends and family.
@9K65DV6Libertarian 1yr1Y
They should be limited to SP 500 or to trades that cant take effect for 6 months for individual stocks at market value
@84ZWD6LLibertarian 1yr1Y
No, and the ban should extend to family members. All holdings must be sold before swearing into office
@9D787HCLibertarian2yrs2Y
No, they should be allowed to trade in broad sector or muti-sector funds, but not individual stocks. This limitation should apply to immediate family as well.
@9S7P3V4Libertarian9mos9MO
No, and the penalties should be not only more heavily enforced, but should also be proportional to the congress member's income and/or the value of the stock. They also shouldn't be able to get away with avoiding taxes by converting their money into assets and such. This goes for all three branches and those with substantial wealth (the 1%) as well.
@John-ThomasLibertarian 12mos12MO
Yes, but there should be a complete separation of economy and state, so that government decisions cannot affect the value of stock.
@7YXQRQCLibertarian 12mos12MO
No, their investments should be held in a blind trust because they can't be trusted to enforce their own rules and regulations.
@9FCB642Libertarian2yrs2Y
Yes, but Ideally there is no government or congress
@977QM3LLibertarian3yrs3Y
No, and it should be considered insider trading if they do trade stocks in office.
@96PJKHGLibertarian3yrs3Y
No, nobody in politics should be allowed to trade stocks while in politics, or their families
@93XL57RLibertarian3yrs3Y
No, this is called Insider Trading. The likes of Nancy Pelosi should be in jail for practicing Insider Trading.
@KodaGwoodLibertarian3yrs3Y
Yes, but majority of their stock portfolio should be required to be in S, G, or C (TSP) fund, as to make sure they have Americas best interest in mind, rather than their own pockets.
@93C34MYLibertarian3yrs3Y
If the government is completely disengaged from the economy, and there is no possibility of cronyism, then they should be able to trade whatever they want.
@939Y4DFLibertarian3yrs3Y
Their stock trades are none of our business
@83VCCTMLibertarian3yrs3Y
Yes, but under strict guidance and can be fined heavily for any insider trading.
@925BT6PLibertarian3yrs3Y
Nancy Pelosi is a dirty crook with terrible plastic surgery.
@8YQF954Libertarian3yrs3Y
No, this is opens the door to insider trading
@8YK8L6LLibertarian3yrs3Y
Members of congress must trade economic stocks with over sight by the people
@84ZWD6LLibertarian2yrs2Y
No, and the ban should extend to family members. Investments made before serving in office should be sold before taking office
@84ZWD6LLibertarian2yrs2Y
No, and the ban should extend to family members (Not including privately managed accounts). Investments made before serving in office should be held in a blind trust managed by an independent person or group
@84ZWD6LLibertarian2yrs2Y
No, and the ban should extend to family members (Not including privately managed accounts like 401k's and 529's). Investments made before serving in office should be held in a blind trust managed by an independent person or group
@84ZWD6LLibertarian2yrs2Y
No, and the ban should extend to family members. Investments made before serving in office should be held in a blind trust managed by an independent person or group
@97LDT2LLibertarian3yrs3Y
Let them do what they want as long as it doesn’t affect the government or the people
@97H645QLibertarian3yrs3Y
Yes, but with their holdings in a blind trust, so they don’t know which investments are in their portfolio.
@maadiman1170Libertarian3yrs3Y
Yes, but all trading should be pre-cleared by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to ensure no questionable transactions are taking place.
@maadiman1170Libertarian2yrs2Y
Yes, but all trading should be pre-cleared by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to ensure no questionable transactions are taking place, and all trades should be made public prior to their execution so that everyone else can decide if they want to take advantage of this information.
@8ZJH5GHLibertarian3yrs3Y
Yes but their portfolio should be published
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.