Congress passed the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act (STOCK Act) in 2012, following more than 10 years of allegations of insider trading by members of Congress and staff. Initially introduced in 2006, Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) and Rep. Brian Baird (D-WA) drafted the STOCK Act in response to insider trading allegations against Tony Rudy, a top aide to the onetime House Majority Leader Rep. Tom DeLay, as well as an insider trading scandal faced by Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist in 2005. Critics argue that The STOCK Act has failed to achieve its goal of penalizing members for…
Read moreNarrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Voting for candidate:
@6WRHQKB 7mos7MO
Yes, as long as their trades are public reported in real time and with strict protections against insider trading
@9WMMCM97mos7MO
No, put all assets into a blind trust and have regular audits of their family and other associates to prevent insider trading.
@84ZWD6LLibertarian 1yr1Y
No, and the ban should extend to family members. All holdings must be sold before swearing into office
No, and substantially increase the financial penalties for insider trading
No, and increase the punishment of insider training severely
@9CBZCTX2yrs2Y
Yes, only if their profits go to their consituatiants
@Angreji_JalebiSocialist2yrs2Y
When it comes to those who serve in public office, whether they are congressmen and women at both the state and national level, and even other members of the government, we need to have a safeguard system in place to prevent insider trading, and to prevent our elected officials from taking advantage of the system. It would be of interest to have a government oversight financial committee, or a third party financial system where there are independent financial advisors that run each elected officials investments. Every investment is made public and taken note of, and if anything happens, it would be taken care of in the appropriate manner, in relation to the situation at hand.
@84ZWD6LLibertarian2yrs2Y
No, and the ban should extend to family members. Investments made before serving in office should be sold before taking office
@84ZWD6LLibertarian2yrs2Y
No, and the ban should extend to family members (Not including privately managed accounts). Investments made before serving in office should be held in a blind trust managed by an independent person or group
@84ZWD6LLibertarian2yrs2Y
No, and the ban should extend to family members (Not including privately managed accounts like 401k's and 529's). Investments made before serving in office should be held in a blind trust managed by an independent person or group
@84ZWD6LLibertarian2yrs2Y
No, and the ban should extend to family members. Investments made before serving in office should be held in a blind trust managed by an independent person or group
@97564H63yrs3Y
No, and the government should nationalize the economy.
Join in on more popular conversations.