Currently, police unions are allowed to collectively bargain with government officials over the methods used to hold police officers accountable for misconduct. Proponents argue that collective bargaining stands in the way of accountability. Opponents of limiting collective bargaining argue that more intense criticism of police will disincentivize officers from doing their jobs resulting in crime rates going up.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Voting for candidate:
Zipcode:
@9JK4ZNF1yr1Y
Yes, and proper formal education should be required for entrance into police enforcement, with a minimum of a 2 year associates law degree.
@9JGMSZRRepublican1yr1Y
Yes, police officers should not be able to bargain their way out of being held accountable for their misconduct.
@99YG9G5Progressive2yrs2Y
Yes, but ONLY in cases involving misconduct. Allow collective bargaining for other rights and pay.
@95RNF7S3yrs3Y
Do not know enough to make a decision
@8X6LHQZ4yrs4Y
No to limiting their unions, yes to limiting collective bargaining power
@8V5RFK74yrs4Y
Yes, but reform the agreement toward the police department and union has an active relationship.
@8TMHG6JIndependent4yrs4Y
No, but we need to reform certain parts of labor unions to become part of the business
@8TFXB674yrs4Y
Don’t know enough about this topic to give an honest answer.
@mdemars884yrs4Y
Yes, police unions should not be using collective bargaining to protect officers that fail to uphold their conduct in the line of duty.
@97BRPG83yrs3Y
Yes and make it easier to terminate police officers for gross misconduct
@9XGLDHW7mos7MO
I am unsure what this means but I believe that police misconduct should be handled much harsher than it is now. Police officers are supposed to protect people, not needlessly harm people.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
