Do you support qualified immunity for police officers?

Yes, but improve efforts to charge officers with criminal charges for misconduct rather than fiscal responsibility.

if there is a history of misconduct an officer's immunity can be revoked. There should also be more training and education.

I do not believe in immunity for one's actions after swearing an oath yo uphold the law but do agree more training and education us required in law enforcement.

Policemen should be already made aware of their rules and regulations before the job and while in the job. There shouldn't be a reason why cops aren't educated on how to do their job.

No, but their stress needs to be addressed. Shorter shifts, shorter weeks, rotate between street and desk, ...

Yes, but only given more training and education for police officer and with independent investigations in every case and with police departments not having immunity, and police unions should be banned.

Combination of "Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints" but only in very specific cases with a lot of evidence and proper trial and everything, and "No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct "

i don't have an opion

Police should be held accountable and not abuse their power but do need to have more training so that mistakes won't be as common.

They should always be held accountable which is why they should be trained to handle all scenarios they would come across

No, every law enforcement officer (LEO) at every level of government must be required to carry liability insurance (bonded) so that they pay for their misconduct instead of tax payers. Police unions and departments must equally share that responsibility. Additionally, every LEO must be required to video record every interaction with citizens at all times, no excuses. Qualified immunity is unconstitutional and was fabricated by the court system to protect officers who make mistakes, but it has devolved to a system that perpetuates police corruption. The loopholes created by the judicial…  Read more system only furthers police criminal activity. These loopholes must be removed. President Obama eliminated the FBI’s responsibility of oversight into police misconduct due to Red Flag laws which further exacerbated the problem. The FBI and state equivalent agencies must reassume their role of LEO oversight conjunction with a civilian review process. The problem of police corruption has significantly increased due to President Obama’s decisions about FBI oversight and tracking of criminal activity which ultimately led to the “Define the Police” movement. Bad cops make all cops look bad. End qualified immunity and let the court system resolve police misconduct. Several states have taken the initiative made some progress in this area.

Yes, but only against unfounded civil suits

Yes if they're a good Samaritan but should be provided more training and education for police officers.

No, and we should abolish the police

No, because as an officer, they should know what counts as misconduct and what doesn't, having immunity will lead to more officers getting away with things they should have already been taught and are supposed to understand

No, this only incentivizes police to not do their research.

Qualified immunity ought to be removed from Police Officers, Prosecutors, and Judges.

Yes as long as the officer is in good standing in the department, and don't have previous complaints

Yes, but only for officers with clean records AND provide more training and education for police officers

No, just like normal citizens are held up to a standard to know all laws so should cops.

Does not apply

Officers should be held to a higher standard than the people on to enforce the law safely.

No, qualified immunity is abused consistently and is purposely not clearly defined. However I do believe there needs to be something in place to protect officers who were simply doing their job.