Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

7.3k Replies

 @9D823CRRepublican from Wyoming  answered…2yrs2Y

No. Government is only allowed to break up companies that constitute a monopoly.

 @9XY6KG5Republican  from Wisconsin  answered…7mos7MO

No, but we should pass an “Internet Bill of Rights” that expands the rights of free speech and privacy to online communications.

 @3X3XDY8Republican answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but only if they are determined to be a monopoly by an impartial jury, not the federal government.

 @9VVTPTXRepublican from Washington  answered…7mos7MO

These corporations should be restricted from further growth and prevented from further infringement of American’s rights.

 @9V7HLH6Republican from Nevada  answered…8mos8MO

Only Facebook and Gooogle because they are using their platforms to influence elections, censor voices they don’t agree with, and sell private information about people.

 @9T3FD2SRepublican from Tennessee  answered…9mos9MO

One platform should not have a monopoly of our personal information, nor track our personal shopping.

 @9SMR4SBRepublican from Illinois  answered…9mos9MO

I believe the government should be able to break up any monopoly that undeniably strangles competition, which is the hallmark of free market capitalism.

 @9R5FKRMRepublican from New Jersey  answered…10mos10MO

They would have to go under review for monopolistic practices and after careful review if these companies were found to be killing any new competition and small businesses and stifling innovation to a large extent then yes, otherwise no.

 @9L6C6HRRepublicanfrom Virgin Islands  answered…1yr1Y

Add more policies and etc. towards them, so that there is a chance of competition to other businesses, but not directly harm them.

 @9JWV4MLRepublican from Georgia  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, we had laws in the last century for monopolies - they need to be applied to these mega-corporations.

 @9J2PW83Republican from Nevada  answered…1yr1Y

They should audit their behaviors to see if they influence the market like a monopoly and if break them up

 @9HFGPXVRepublican from Tennessee  answered…1yr1Y

They should be regulated to the point that the companies under them have competition between eachother, as to not allow the monopoly to affect prices

 @9GRT437Republican from Utah  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, to an extent. Stop supporting them through government funding an policies, close up the loopholes, and keep them in line with smaller businesses. They're monopolies at this point.

 @9FR2KGHRepublicanfrom Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, because these companies are actively working to hurt American society (not because they are "too big")

 @9FHN492Republican  from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DDPL78Republicananswered…2yrs2Y

facebook is a lot different compared to amazon and google, i believe facebook should be broken up but not exactly google and amazon.

 @9D9C44NRepublican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

yes, Breaking up big tech giants would restore competition and create opportunities.

 @9D84D5BRepublican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, if they cooperate with federal agencies, then they're subject to the U.S. Constitutions as agents of the federal government.

 @RWM1999Republican  from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but limit their involvement with government officials to eliminate cronyism and unfair censorship

 @8FRK9XRRepublican from Maryland  answered…5yrs5Y

 @9GFD59GRepublican from Michigan  answered…2yrs2Y

I think that they shouldn't be able to own so many companies but the core corporations should be left alone

 @9CKGW4ZRepublican from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, the government should break up corporations that are not technically monopolies but nevertheless exert outsize influence

 @9BXLDKTRepublican from New Jersey  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9BVJ6FLRepublican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but the government should regulate these companies to an extent, ensuring they are not out of control.

 @9BLLTN9Republican from New Jersey  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but if any is found using their power for evil, then break them up.

 @97BN32WRepublican from Oregon  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, among other various companies, and the government should no longer provide any financial protections for any businesses. No more bail-outs

 @97BJXX4Republican from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

Government needs to address social media it’s ruining our country. Create a social media set of strict bylaws fund this and prosecute those who misuse social media

 @96MGKFWRepublican from Kentucky  answered…3yrs3Y

Only if there is undeniable evidence that these companies have infringed on the Bill of Rights

 @96LNTDDRepublican from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @96KFDYVRepublican from Idaho  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95YRN2CRepublican from Oklahoma  answered…3yrs3Y

They should be monitored for political biases, censorship, and restrictions on speech.

 @95XRF5SRepublican from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but the companies should be regulated to not monopolize and they should be regulated to where they cannot infringe on the freedom of speech.

 @9545QFWRepublican from Oklahoma  answered…3yrs3Y

No, people should stop supporting them if they believe they have created a monopoly

 @949PH9MRepublican from Alabama  answered…3yrs3Y

 @289XBVRRepublican from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @945G4NTRepublican from Kansas  answered…3yrs3Y

I agree with Senator Warren that these companies are the predominant "platform utilities." However, I do not agree they should be broken up, but rather restructured or reformed under Section 230.

 @94599VBRepublican from South Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but limit the amount of money they can provide to political campaigns.

 @944V6R2Republican from Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but they should insure that differing voices shouldn’t be silenced.

 @93NTX73Republican from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

 @93KY523Republican from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

No, not yet. There is still a chance those companies can return to their origins and value individual liberties, privacy, and freedom of speech, again.

 @93JCH7ZRepublican from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

 @93H8THBRepublican from Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but the government should treat FLAG companies like the private corporations they are and refuse to provide subsidies and/or government projects to them

 @93GFB27Republican from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but drastically reduce their influence and crack down on their violations of free speech and privacy

 @933DQMWRepublican from New Jersey  answered…3yrs3Y

Facebook’s constituent services should ideally be separate and competitive. Amazon and Google can remain, but they should have more oversight.

 @92Z2MM7Republican from Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92JL59SRepublican from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

allow more opportunities for smaller companies but still allow for the convenience factor of Amazon

 @92DY85LRepublican from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

Not break up but severely investigate for corruption and silenced speech. And if they are not follow by the guidelines and our constitution and choose to not comply then they should be broken up.

 @929VRQDRepublican from West Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @928PQJHRepublican from Tennessee  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but if all three companies cross the line towards its users than the government should step in to an extent

 @926LR48Republican from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but legislate that they must respect the constitutional rights of their users such as the first amendment.

 @8ZHWJD6Republican from Alabama  answered…3yrs3Y

Only Amazon should be considered because of how many sectors they are involved in.

 @8ZD3SC4Republican from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

They should break up the corruption that allows monopolies to buy law makers.

 @8ZC6H3VRepublican from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

I don't agree with intervention on this issue, but it's important to keep competition going in America.

 @8Z6ZKBSRepublican from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8YZH2RPRepublican from Colorado  answered…3yrs3Y

No, and the government should never be involved in privatized companies

 @8YSZMKSRepublican from Michigan  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but those entities shouldn’t be allowed to hide behind laws for news/non-opinion entities.

 @8YSQQPSRepublican from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only within Reason. They should be required to sell off other names assets, Like Instagram or Youtube.

 @8YJVDWCRepublican from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8YHSB5BRepublican from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only Amazon. All social media should be shut down for up to 30 days a year to encourage exercise.

 @8YDKV56Republican from Kentucky  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8Y84WCQRepublican from Tennessee  answered…3yrs3Y

The government should actively monitor these companies for anti-competitive behavior, and proactively act to stop it.

 @8Y2TFHHRepublican from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

The government should have zero affiliation with Amazon, Google And Facebook.

 @8XGJ3T7Republican from Indiana  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8X6RHMXRepublican from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WYNVWMRepublican from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WXSZ9FRepublican from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but should treat public spaces like social media as public private trusts and Amazon should be punished for monopolies.

 @8WVMS7KRepublican from Oklahoma  answered…4yrs4Y

Government should limit the power on these three. I believe it would be good to break them up.

 @8WQ95YCRepublican from Kansas  answered…4yrs4Y

For their mass censorship, yes I believe that the government should break these companies up.

 @8WNSDX2Republican from Alabama  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WG78F3Republican from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

No. The government should have no involvement in regulations of businesses/websites

 @8WDSK78Republican from South Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WC5VH3Republican from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but they should be given an ultimatum: stop censoring free speech or face liability for libel.

 @8W9BRK2Republican from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8W5Q3GDRepublican from Iowa  answered…4yrs4Y

Not right now but sometime in the future if they start to become a monopoly than yes

 @8VJ7BW2Republican from Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...