Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

2.5k Replies

 @8Q9XCNW from Washington  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but the current way of doing it is garbage. Cut all foreign aid and all aid that goes to large corporations and give it to lower-income American people who can't work during the pandemic.

 @PepperflyLibertarianfrom Idaho  answered…5yrs5Y

No. Change the banking industry to mitigate recessions; convert and eliminate dubious compounding interest loans to simple interest only to help debtors free up money that they can then spend in the economy, rather than allowing the companies that get bailed out to keep ripping off consumers of their stimulus money.

 @8GGSQMV from Connecticut  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but in the form of employing those furloughed and unemployed for community service projects

 @9MJDCRXRepublican from New Jersey  answered…12mos12MO

Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for low-income citizens, (i.e. those who make less than 69k a year)

 @9KB979SRepublican from Wisconsin  answered…1yr1Y

depends on where the money is coming from. if were giving printed money then we shouldn't, if its money that we already have printed then yes

 @9J2PW83Republican from Nevada  answered…1yr1Y

recession should be combatted by a balance of inputs which include but are not limited to some limited stimulus counteracted by other actions

 @9HVNPSM from New York  answered…1yr1Y

I don't disagree with using economic stimulus, however, during COVID, stimulus checks were being given out for way too long.

 @9HF2BQKRepublican from Missouri  answered…1yr1Y

Depending on situation, if high risk of economic failure there should be stimulus but not often because to much will also hurt the economy through inflation

 @9HDW4B3 from Oregon  answered…1yr1Y

Personally very conflicted on the issue. It has its benefits but if left unchecked it can actually make the situation worse. I think it should but it should be very limited and expire the moment the recession is over.

 @9DPYCS7Republican from Kansas  answered…2yrs2Y

The government should have reinstated the WPA to give jobs to those that were laid off and by having them work on the infrastructure of American it can help the economy grow better then before.

 @9D8S5QHRepublican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

No. We can’t really afford it right now and stimulus checks make inflation worse.

 @8V6F6VLRepublican from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but there has to be a limit otherwise people will take advantage of the system.

 @9B6VCD2 from Indiana  answered…2yrs2Y

 @95YR7YMRepublican from Indiana  answered…3yrs3Y

If stimulus is warranted then it should be to spent on cost of living bills, housing and food.

 @95FRR2JRepublican from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

The govt should bulk up infrastructure in times of recession along with giving everyone a break on taxes to take off some of the pressure that comes with rapid inflation

 @94G3DTDSocialist from Arizona  answered…3yrs3Y

 @948JWCP from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

No, the government should not because that will only put our country in more debt in the future. This has been proven with gas prices and many other things.

 @93T3Z7DRepublican from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

It depends what the cause of the recession is. Government response should be targeted at the root cause of the recession or the direct byproduct

 @93MPHXHRepublican from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

There should be no set stance as each situation requires a different response

 @93H8THBRepublican from Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

No. Corporate welfare enables the type of behavior that causes recessions

 @8ZYWFTFRepublican from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, in the form of tax breaks or other ways to boost recovery, however the government should not over-spend and give citizens a chance to find jobs and other ways to economically recover.

 @8ZG6BC2Republican from Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZBGTM3Republican from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8YSQQPSRepublican from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but Stimulus should be for private citizens and small businesses, not Corporations

 @8Y2TFHHRepublican from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes but without overdoing it because people need to quit being lazy and go back to work

 @8XRN9YGRepublican from Arkansas  answered…3yrs3Y

yes but only for the ones who really need it and have resrictions on what they can buy

 @8XM9QXCRepublican from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

The government should pay the people who lost their jobs and are in need. but when the recess ends and people can get their jobs I think the government should help people get their jobs back and not pay them unless it's 100% necessary.

 @8XCZGJNRepublican from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8X83JWKRepublican from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but do not spend too much and focus more on getting people back to work rather than throwing money at the middle class

 @8X39G5Nfrom Montana  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WMMY79Republican from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8W6KDS9 from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but they should minimize the amount of money that they give to each family, giving them a boost in their financial situation. It would also be helpful to lower taxes in these times of need.

 @8VNP8MTRepublicanfrom Maine  answered…4yrs4Y

El gobierno deberia intervenir para impulsar una recuperacion con paquetes de estimulo y dar cobertura a los más desprotegidos

 @8VHXJXG from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VDM9XK from Kansas  answered…4yrs4Y

they need to regulate who gets it if you sit on your *** and don't do a damn thing then thats their problem

 @8V9HBCWRepublicanfrom Guam  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but in the form of: 1.) tax breaks for all citizens; 2.) assisting sectors most heavily hit by recession; and 3.) reducing government spending during recessions

 @8V9HBCWRepublicanfrom Guam  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but in the form of: 1.) tax breaks for all citizens; 2.) assisting sectors most heavily hit by recession; and 3.) gradually reducing government spending during recessions

 @bacampbellsoup from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes but in the public sector and later transferred to the private sector.

 @8TMWCWVRepublican from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8THWK9N from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but by lowering interest rates and taxes and then sending out stimulus checks

 @7WXBLXCRepublican from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes but only if it's caused by external factors (ie Covid) and is approaching a depression.

 @8SZBCF7Republican from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes but it should well thought out and not in a way that hurts the economy of the country in whole.

 @8SJC66Q from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

american's don't need stimulus we need to reopen the economy, americans need to stop using covid as an excuse

 @8SBLVY3 from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

I would say yes to a certain point. As of now there are plenty of jobs to go around and the government at this point is just giving out free money. They are teaching bad habits to our workers.

 @8S9VWF4Republican from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but have a cut off at some point so people stop mooching off of unemployment

 @8S8JG9YRepublican from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

In this latest plandemic wealthy BIG corporations profited and the tax payer was not allowed to work. Wealth disparity increases

 @8RYRGD4Republican from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RV584VRepublican from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RNS52CRepublican from Colorado  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RNSG6LRepublican from Illinois  answered…4yrs4Y

yes, however not everyone who gets it needs it, so the money should go to families with little money, not wealthy people

 @8RFR7CSRepublican from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but the covid recession is an exception because the economic damage was partially caused by government.

 @8R9QRXBRepublican from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for all citizens, further reductions of tariffs and regulations, and assisting more small businesses instead of giving bailouts to large corporations.

 @8R8MHJK from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

No, the government is the culprit in recessions that are bad enough to justify an economic stimulus.

 @8R7F5Y7Republican from Kansas  answered…4yrs4Y

No, that makes Americans are too dependable on the government and that goes against what we believe. There shouldn't be stimulus and there shouldn't be lockdowns

 @8QTFTCM from Washington  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8QRXS6S from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8QPBT4RRepublican from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

No, normally it shouldn't, but with covid you can see a use for it, especially after government shut down many jobs

 @dillonraganIndependent from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8QMFX5JRepublican from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for all citizens and giving financial aid to assist sector most heavily affected by the recession.

 @8QKFZQ9 from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8QCB9GGRepublican from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8QBTSBBRepublican from Washington  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only if there is no way for people (who are willing to work) to work.

 @8Q9GLTXRepublican from Tennessee  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, for this country only! There should never be an unplanned taxation for our citizens due to crisis for another country. Citizens do not have time to research for support or against a proposed bill.

 @8Q6LVTMRepublican from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8Q599RK from Washington  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but don't raise taxes; instead, take the money that the corrupt politicians are giving to foreign terrorist countries like Afghanistan and Pakistan and give it to the people. Also, fire the politicians who support foreign aid.

 @8PNP4DB from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but in the form of tax breaks, infrastructure spending, protectionism, and Arms manufactoring.

 @8PHCQYFRepublican from Iowa  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, Only in severe cases of recessions like covid-19 and there should be cut off point.

 @8PDJJJHRepublican from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

 @maxfern414Republicanfrom Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8N7RNFRRepublican from Mississippi  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8MYY52BRepublican from Illinois  answered…5yrs5Y

 @realanthonyxRepublican from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

It depends on the kind of recession. For example, if there is a worldwide virus pandemic, and the government in many areas of the United States have lockdowns in place preventing people from working, then the government is constitutionally required to compensate the workers for lost wages, and that could come in the form of stimulus. In other recessions where government lockdowns are not ordered, my answer to this question would be yes, in the form of tax breaks for all citizens.

 @8M83RSPRepublican from Alabama  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8M825GQRepublican from New Jersey  answered…5yrs5Y

It should be in the form of tax breaks for all people and companies that apply, just as they would for stimulus.

 @TheMediatorRepublican from Delaware  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, as long as it is affordable, and will not have a great adverse impact on the federal budget.

 @8LM4BVWRepublican from Ohio  answered…5yrs5Y

It should benefit all if a stimulus is given. I have not benefited and I’m a single mother of 2, 1 currently at OSU and the other entering the Marines.

 @8LCN7DMRepublican from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but in the form of a debit card with an expiration date. Therefore, the citizens that need assistance have it.

 @8L72YLGRepublican from Missouri  answered…5yrs5Y

yes but do more background checks because people used the stimulus to make a lot of money even though they didn't need it

 @Klb514 from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

Don’t know enough about how it boosts the economy vs adds to the national debt.

 @8KN97NXRepublican from Maryland  answered…5yrs5Y

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...