Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

7.4k Replies

 @8HKRDZR from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but only if the end goal is to wean addicts off and rehabilitate them.

 @8S9HYLHDemocrat  from Massachusetts  answered…3mos3MO

I believe in solutions that save lives, reduce harm, and help people recover. Supervised consumption sites should only be part of a broader public health strategy — one that includes access to treatment, accountability for dealers, and community input. These sites aren’t about condoning drug use. They’re about preventing overdose deaths, connecting people to help, and easing the burden on emergency services and law enforcement. If we’re serious about tackling addiction, we can’t ignore the evidence — but we also can’t impose one-size-fits-all approaches on communities that aren’t ready.

 @B2H4JBY from Massachusetts  answered…5mos5MO

I think cities need to open more rehab centers that allow anyone with a drug problems to come in and get help.

 @9YJQKXT from Massachusetts  answered…8mos8MO

Yes it's necessary and that it could reduce overdose death rates, but having safe havens could encourage that it's okay to use these drugs. I think it would be better that rehabilitation clinics help these people and try to help them get sober, instead of baby sitting them. As long as these clinics don't abuse the patients or their power, people could get their lives back together.

 @9WWHGTS from Massachusetts  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, but the "safe havens" should be used to help people overcome their addictions in a safe way, not facilitate that their addiction persists but in a safe way.

 @9TRGJZV from Massachusetts  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, but without lowering funding for rehabilitation centers so those who want to get help can still get it.

 @9T4TC2J from Massachusetts  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, we should make safe havens for people that are addicted to these drugs but only if it is needed because some people if they stop there's a likely chance they'll have withdraws.

 @9N2YBQ5 from Massachusetts  answered…1yr1Y

No, but legalize some drugs like marijuana and shrooms and tabaco and alcohol should be lowered to 18. If you can die for your country at 18 you should be able to make your own decisions on what you put into your body. However substances that are both extremely addictive and deadly should still be illegal.

 @9JWYC2N from Massachusetts  answered…1yr1Y

Drug abuse should be treated as a health issue, but this would also lower funding for rehabilitation centers for existing addicts.

 @9J4X9F9  from Massachusetts  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but there needs to be more support for addicts to recover before this can be implemented properly

 @9HVTBDW from Massachusetts  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, it is necessary to reduce the drug overdose death rate, and should be treated as a health issue, not a criminal issue.

 @9HJJTS3 from Massachusetts  answered…2yrs2Y

No, these people should be strongly incentivized by letting the natural consequences of their actions fall upon them so that they seek treatment.

 @9GWZ3KT  from Massachusetts  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, temporarily while we set up free mental health and drug rehabilitation centers across the nation.

 @9GKHXLG from Massachusetts  answered…2yrs2Y

allow for drug use under supervision but at the same time go at a comfortable pace to get drug abusers to quit

 @9FJS7BT from Massachusetts  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but the users should be required to reduce and eventually cease use of the drug.

 @9DW24H9 from Massachusetts  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only under a program which tapers the dose of the drugs so they can safely quit.

 @8H7VB7T from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8HVMBCZLibertarian from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

 @9CCK7RWIndependent from Massachusetts  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but the main goal of these safe havens should be to rehabilitate addicts, not continue to allow them to use drugs that are killing them.

 @96BTWDL from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would lower finding for rehabilitation centers & drug abuse should be treated as a healthy issue, not a criminal issue.

 @95MGSH9Republican from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

No, focus more on rehabilitation methods. instead of encouraging use, encouraging getting sober.

 @93Q9KJ5 from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

Depends on the drug and what kind of safe havens these would be. If the substance amounts are strictly controlled to slowly wean someone off, yes.

 @9358F97Democrat from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92C28N2 from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but encourage rehabilitation drug abuse should be treated as a health issue, not a criminal issue

 @8Z7WKNT from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and provide access to trained mental health and substance use experts on site.

 @8YKFP4YDemocrat from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8Y5VKNG from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

Rehab funding is more important and drug abuse should be treated as a health issue

 @8Y5BTRDIndependent from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but open more rehabilitation centers for drug abusers to get better

 @8XS5VHVIndependent from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VYFW8S from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SD7V9J from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but they should have a sentence in jail if they get addicted again if they got off drugs at the rehabilitation centre.

 @8QWKG3Q from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8QSBHPQ from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but it would be better to open more rehabilitation centers for drug addicts instead.

 @8PXBYW5Democrat from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

No, medical professionals should be supervising the process of weaning the addict off of drugs.

 @8NFZX5N from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but with the goal to he a short term stay and weaning them off narcotics

 @8L3DHKM from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

Not at all, that’s not going to help them at all...just fuels there addiction even more.

 @8KPPB7L from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but only if accompanied by treatment and rehabilitation with the goal of getting them off the drugs completely

 @8F2KZWLDemocrat from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8DCJ99Y from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8D3LBGJ from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

Possibly, there are ethical dilemmas in doing so, but I support ideas similar to this

 @9CM8ZLNSocialist from Massachusetts  answered…2yrs2Y

 @fribble7 from Massachusetts  answered…2yrs2Y

If the states decide to open a safe haven, then I would support it. It should be a states issue.

 @99L6GXZProgressive from Massachusetts  answered…2yrs2Y

 @98FCYTJ from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

Don't allow them to unless necessary for survival, give them medical care and not classify it as a criminal act unless they are selling it.

 @97K5GN4 from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but apply offer rehabilitation centers that medical professionals could offer safe drugs at incrementally lower levels with the goal of rehabilitation

 @8Y25HYQ from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

This should be treated as a health issue BUT it should not be supervised use.

 @8V5PJ3X from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

Recriminalize all narcotics. Make the punishments more severe, create federal incentive for advertising tobacco and alcohol.

 @75P4P5Z from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...