A Universal Basic Income program is social security program where all citizens of a country receive a regular, unconditional sum of money from the government. The funding for Universal Basic Income comes from taxation and government owned entities including income from endowments, real estate and natural resources. Several countries, including Finland, India and Brazil, have experimented with a UBI system but have not implemented a permanent program. The longest running UBI system in the world is the Alaska Permanent Fund in the U.S. state of Alaska. In the Alaska Permanent Fund each indivi…
Read moreNarrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
@54GWHT8 12mos12MO
Yes, but more through providing essential services such as healthcare, public transport, and other social services.
@8DTXKQR5yrs5Y
Yes, and use the wages from automated machines that replaced jobs
@8YTCNZ54yrs4Y
Yes, but only those who are below the poverty line should be granted this income.
@8W9G4FQ4yrs4Y
yes and no, everyone should receive an income but it wont mean stop working.
@8TNGSMT4yrs4Y
No, Universal Basic income without Single payer healthcare, Free College, and Housing Programs is a distraction from those policies
Somewhat, a negative income tax would be more effective
Yes, but only if they make less than a certain amount
@8SB3KFV4yrs4Y
No, other social programs are better than leaving it up to the market
Yes, if it is of decent quality. Free/Less expensive government plans usually aren't good quality and are unreliable.
yes, but not enough to quick working
@8RZ7ZWJ5yrs5Y
They should make it so only those who need it get it. and bring more jobs back to America rather then out sourcing.
@8RYV4BP5yrs5Y
no this would be an excuse for the destruction of the welfare state
@8RXFKJX5yrs5Y
Yes, it should be just enough to help people get by, but not enough for people to live on without some form of extra income.
@8RVPZZT5yrs5Y
At a certain age to support the elderly with no income.
@8RT8WG75yrs5Y
People need to actually have a real reason to have this, but if they do, like autism or some other thing that keeps them from working a normal job, than yes.
@8RMWJXH5yrs5Y
i have absolutely no idea what this is...
No, cause there's no guarantee that the money will go to food and housing. Perhaps increase food subsidies.
@8QLMFJY5yrs5Y
I think this is good but people who already have a lot of money don't need this. And make it to where those people eligible are also helping the community and not just feeding off of this.
@8QH9BMK5yrs5Y
Yes but there should be a specific reason that they can't do it on their own and they should still need to work and be provided what they can't provide themselves
@8Q95N5Y5yrs5Y
Yes, so everyone can survive and pay what they need to pay.
@8Q8K7P65yrs5Y
Unity is our only resort
@8Q6C3245yrs5Y
I say yes and no because we should all be able to have basic necessities but at the same time it would encourage people to not work and harm economic growth.
@8Q484325yrs5Y
yes, but you have to be working, applying, or in school to benefit
@8PYQZX35yrs5Y
Not until national debt is over
@8PM2KZ45yrs5Y
UBI is an excellent idea but to give money and not ensure such money will be sapped up by landlords and grocers on a large sale could cause no proper change to occur
@8PD4R6F5yrs5Y
Yes, but that shouldn't be used to strip current welfare programs because it would lead to price shoking
@8NWCYK55yrs5Y
@8NS9SKY5yrs5Y
For people in need only.
@8NRMVTW5yrs5Y
Yes, as long as existing welfare programs and social safety nets aren't eroded as a result.
@8MBKVNT5yrs5Y
Yes, enough to help those in need become more financially secure but it should not be so much that people stop working and moving society forward.
Yes, but there must be proof of income and a review for those who need it every 6-12 months.
@8LBV5K65yrs5Y
Only if it's not funded with regressive taxes
@8L24ZJ85yrs5Y
Yes, but it should only be allowed to be given to individuals that are struggling to provide for their basic needs.
@8K2MYVX5yrs5Y
I think money should be going to help people who face unfortunate events as the result of an emergency
@8JZ88ND5yrs5Y
Yes, but u can not be doing drugs and weekly drug text and spend it on stuff u need.
@8JXMXHQ5yrs5Y
I think this can help some people but can also hurt the economy, I'm indifferent but it does sound like a good idea only if people use it for good.
@8JRB6FX5yrs5Y
I believe that people that are trying and have a job but cant support should get help
@8JHRKKB5yrs5Y
No, I support universal basic wealth. Income just gets spent. We have sufficient GDP now to guarantee all people the ability to support themselves just on the interest income from their share.
@8JG5NQG5yrs5Y
Yes, but for people that are proven to be unable to live without the program.
@8J9B3MS5yrs5Y
Yes, but automated space communism is a better solution
@8J928HW5yrs5Y
I do not have information or know enough to take a stand
@8J8522D5yrs5Y
If your career field is replaced by automation, then you should get an income for a limited time until you receive the training for or have another career.
@8J3WVTNWomen’s Equality5yrs5Y
This should be a service to those having children, adopting, with medical/psychiatric conditions, Etc. who do not have the ability to work.
@8HR37NN5yrs5Y
If done correctly this could help a lot of people out. But the way I see people use our welfare system now it would only encourage people not to work. While I know some people only use the welfare money on necessities I also see a lot use it for wants instead of needs. Until some way of making sure people receiving benefits are working and not wasting, I disagree in the need for this. Though I was also raised to show that hard work will get you something.
@8HHSSK9Progressive5yrs5Y
Yes, but only if the federal minimum wage is not a living wage
@8HDWJN95yrs5Y
I'd say that it will be better long term
@8HD585RWomen’s Equality5yrs5Y
this should be avaiable to the low income familys and or people that are working but need a little more help.
Yes, but only to those whose income is currently less than the amount received by a UBI system
@8GTMKQS5yrs5Y
Yes, but this should be decided and implemented at a state level similar to Alaska.
@8GJWVFD5yrs5Y
Only if you're of legal age and are completely unable to pick up a job of any kind
I believe that young adults should have access to an income that covers basic necessities including food and housing for the first 3 years of their lives to encourage them to balance their work income. I also believe the elderly and retired should have access to these benefits without limitations once they hit a certain age.
@8FQN2W85yrs5Y
Only for the people who really need it
@8FHQCLY5yrs5Y
Yes, but the person needs to provide a source of income from a job. If without a job, there needs to be documentation of why that it. Ex. injury
@8F76RKG5yrs5Y
yes, but it should phase out existing welfare programs
@Inverse32645yrs5Y
Yes, but I would rather support decommodification of basic necessities such as food and housing.
@8DX7G735yrs5Y
Yes, but require those that can work to seek out jobs while receiving it
@8DWS786Progressive5yrs5Y
Yes but require that people over the age of 18 work 25+ hours a week to get this funding, and anyone under 18 must be enrolled in school & this money should be taxable like any other income
@8DSF67Z5yrs5Y
Yes, however you have to have maintained employment for the majority of the time period. We can't give out free money to people who aren't working towards making money themselves. In addition, people on social security and disability would not receive. They are not putting into the system so they should not be taking out more than they already are. I think it would also slow they rate at which people get on social security. They wouldn't use it until they need it. It could be used a reward system for people who are putting in the effort.
I don't have enough information about this question to make an opinion on.
@8DHYBCH5yrs5Y
No, this will eventually lead to inflation. We can’t just keep upping the UBI so in the long run it’s not going to solve anything unless you can solve the inflation issue.
@8D5J2M2Independent5yrs5Y
@8CY79TG5yrs5Y
Having a small boost in income would help certain families in or near poverty, and shouldn't be raised to the point where somebody could life off it. It should be complimentary to a hard working citizen's already existing paycheck.
@8CXNTDR5yrs5Y
There should be a sum for people for the homeless, those in poverty, and struggling lower middle class (>35,000 income from a family with three or more)
@8CX68H55yrs5Y
Yes, but you must have a job or actively look for work and prove it
@8CVYYXL5yrs5Y
yes, but programs should be enforced to make sure this runs smoothly and honestly
There should be a pilot program to see the economic and social impact the basic income would have
@8CM52LH5yrs5Y
Yes, but only for senior citizens, terminally ill and severely disabled
yes, but with strict regulations on elegebilty.
@8CF598K5yrs5Y
Yes, but individuals need to have a job or be actively looking for one, similar to how the unemployment system works. Unless they are unable to work due to illness
@8C5LZ6D5yrs5Y
Everyone should receive a benefit check from the extraction of natural resources similar to the one in Alaska, Everyone should be guaranteed a job if they choose to work and if the private sector isn't stable enough to provide those jobs, the US gov't should. There's plenty of work that needs to be done that is not being funded or relies on volunteers. We need to fund those projects to give people work.
@8LV6N365yrs5Y
Yes, only for the unemployed.
UBI should not be the end all solution, it is not sustainable without a complete overhaul of the previous system
my naber lives off this has 2 every day cars a fast car and a super moded truck and is unenploied
@8HDB9785yrs5Y
Yes, but to the point where it doesn't make it so people don't have to work hard.
@8GWYKJL5yrs5Y
Yes, but only those who cannot afford basic needs
@8GMNJKF5yrs5Y
During the pandemic, yes. I'd like to treat it as a pilot program and potentially make permanent but would want the data before going that far.
@8GMCCLW5yrs5Y
Yes, but it should be offered as part of a program to help people enter the workforce and should only be used temporarily until they can enter the workforce.
@8GJVXZ55yrs5Y
Yes, only to those who are really in need it or those who cant work much for a health or legal reason.
@8G5JDT75yrs5Y
Yes but you have to be employed or retired.
@8FZMRTL5yrs5Y
Should be required to work full time and receive food stamps and house buying assistance / rent.
UBI is an attempted social compromise designed to appease lesser educated socialists while simultaneously making actual socialism seem doomed to fail.
@8F74G9Y5yrs5Y
yes, but only if the person receiving the money needs it and is working currently.
@8DN4VHB5yrs5Y
Yes but it should not be unconditional, it should be tied to income, and should be allowed to pass for a tax incentive
@8D7HVL55yrs5Y
you should have to apply and be approved and also must have a job to show u are working
Yes, but citizens receiving this income must prove they have a job and they their annual income should determine if they qualify
@owenfuckem5yrs5Y
Regardless, the material issues addressed by a UBI in a capitalist system are more efficiently solved using socialist frameworks.
@8HW6C9M5yrs5Y
I don,t really have a large input on this topic.
Yes, but only for unemployed but require employment after an amount of time unless disabled or an elderly. Needs more requirements before approval.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.