Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Mandatory Vaccinations

38.8k Replies

 @9D9BRTL from California  answered…2yrs2Y

 @B5GFTHR from California  answered…1mo1MO

Require for public school and hold parents responsible for not vaccinating children and having disease spread to other children.

 @B574JXY from California  answered…1mo1MO

no but parents are held criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children but there should be exceptions for religious beliefs

 @B42KFGT from California  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, only if the child does not have an already compromised immune system or is allergic to the vaccine's compounds.

 @B2PYQVZNo Labels from California  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but no one should be profiting off of vaccines/medications in order to ensure that there are no alternative reasons for pushing unnecessary ones on people

 @B2HTP5C from California  answered…5mos5MO

I think yes but I think that only if they want to and I also think that it should be heavily studied more studying on them then they do now

 @9TZRH3Q from California  answered…9mos9MO

I believe everyone should be vaccinated but I also believe that if you dont want to its your choice, the choice of a vaccine should be the childs choice at the age of 13 when they should be able to make more of their own choices. I may think that you are less intelligent then most if you don't get vaccinated but its your right to be or not. non vaccinated children might need to be taught online.

 @9TMB34F from California  answered…9mos9MO

I think it should be up to the parent, but if it were a deadly diseases I think it should be mandatory if going to public school because that child is going to be around other children.

 @9T88VGGLibertarian from California  answered…9mos9MO

I believe this should be decided on a state level but I also believe people have the free-will to get vaccinated whether they want to or not. of course, it'd be much better to be vaccinated for something like chicken pox if you're attending public school on a daily.

 @9T36H9K from California  answered…9mos9MO

yes to vaccines that have been studied for a long period of time and we know all side affects and long term affects to it before wanting people to get them

 @9SF7NNN from California  answered…10mos10MO

If it's a deadly disease, yes. But ultimately, the parent should still choose based off of risk factors they see and are concerned about.

 @9S7TPFJ from California  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, but only for vaccines that have been tested and proven safe and effective by scientists, not declared so by politicians.

 @9LVW4XV from California  answered…1yr1Y

No, but it should be required in order to attend public school, and parents should be held criminally liable if their child or another child contracts a deadly disease as a result of their poor treatment.

 @9LRKQWB from California  answered…1yr1Y

If they aren't allergic or there reason is like an ABSOLUTE fear of needles that they can't take the vaccine. They shouldn't be forced to, otherwise yes.

 @9JT4VL8 from California  answered…1yr1Y

i don't think they should be required. i think it should be up to the parent who most likely knows best

 @9J8H8T9 from California  answered…1yr1Y

We’ve always required vaccinations. However; with the inception of COVID, I have been more hesitant to saying that government should require vaccination, when the population was subjected to the largest human experiment on the planet with unknown downstream impact. Those who were hesitant were cast out.

 @okletswin from California  answered…1yr1Y

There have always been vaccine requirements to my awareness. COVID was an experimental drug and we were the test subjects. I think it’s critical that while certain vaccines are mandatory, things like COVID are not. I didn’t select “yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases”, because some would have considered COVID in that category, in which I do not.

 @9HYJJ7L from California  answered…1yr1Y

Unless the vaccine of any kind interferes with your health for any reason then yes, all children should be vaccinated

 @9HWGQRF from California  answered…1yr1Y

No, because we can just get home schooled if we have covid or another disease, Or just mail us the school work.

 @9HVR47Q from California  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases & as long as the person receiving the vaccine can take it without being hurt.

 @9HLHP7N from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes and parents who don’t vaccinate their children should be criminally prosecuted for child abuse and liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children.

 @9GV9HG4 from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes. Children are exceptionally important for the future, and if the death rate increased for children, that means a lower population.

 @9FNWVRYLibertarian from California  answered…2yrs2Y

I can personally say that I have a pretty good immune system and don't really need any of the minor stuff like flu but for anything major I'm okay with.

 @9F7ZPN7 from California  answered…2yrs2Y

for deadly diseases yes, but for other vaccinations only can require children upon entering school system

 @9D98YFK from California  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9D85S78 from California  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9D84D5BRepublican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, except for medical necessities such as allergic reaction to the vaccine.

 @9D5ZY9B from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Only for school and for diseases that have a proven series of shots then done. Not yearly shots for flu or similar viruses

 @8J5KJCG from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, only for deadly contagious diseases and those with religious beliefs that forbid use of vaccines

 @9BMVPHR from California  answered…2yrs2Y

 @99Y6B2R from California  answered…2yrs2Y

 @96P8Z9Y from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @96GPVCSRepublican from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @966LWT4 from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes ,but to an understanding of peoples beliefs of the vaccines but I think it should only be recommended

 @963VZPW from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95TYLHW from California  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but make sure all doctor are educated and are educating parents so PARENTS can make the correct choice for their kids health.

 @95K45D7 from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95H3MMZConstitution from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Traditional vaccines should be required as they always have. Polio, mumps, TB, dyptheia, measles and small pox.

 @94RZMG4 from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but after the vaccinations are secure and have gone through tests to find the outcomes or negative aspects of the vaccination.

 @94H3WVB from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Vaccinations should be required for kids but if there are vaccinations that endanger their age level, then that would be up to their parent/guardian.

 @949KGRW from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @948SZKHDemocrat from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Either side should be able to chose but businesses and other districts have the right to require one to enter in the building or school grounds.

 @948C3Z8Republican from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes allow anyone to have a choice to get vaccinated with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid the use of vaccines. Also there should be thorough research of the ingredients used in vaccines and what the side effects are.

 @93MQPTC from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @93DVQ68 from California  answered…3yrs3Y

yes, these should be mandated for children to attend public school, or for adults to hold jobs in the public. However, this should be limited to vaccines that have long term studies, and have been widely used for 10+ years.

 @93BMML2 from California  answered…3yrs3Y

This should be up to the parents. Fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead.

 @92V438XDemocrat from California  answered…3yrs3Y

I believe that children should get the basic vaccines, but they shouldn't be forced upon anyone due to their religious beliefs or even if they don't want to like the COVID 19 vaccine.

 @92JVR34Independent from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases and with exceptions based on health circumstances and religious beliefs.

 @92JVNHT from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only if the child is physically healthy and won't be negatively impacted by vaccination.

 @92DMVYX from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZTP69L from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZBBL6X from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Require vaccines. Hold parents criminally liable if they do not want to or opt out. If transferred deadly disease

 @8Z7S8FG from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated. Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases

 @8Z4Y9VT from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, as long as the vaccination complete prevents them from contracting the disease.

 @8Z4S3YJ from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8YMK4RK from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes for more deadly ones but if the child has had a past of reactions from vaccines then they should be exempt.

 @8YG4DLB from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8YCLMYR from California  answered…3yrs3Y

I think that people in general SHOULD be vaccinated, but I think forcing it would cause more problems than solutions.

 @8Y8ZK6H from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, unless the child has medical conflicts and would be in danger if given a vaccine

 @8Y8XTQP from California  answered…3yrs3Y

I think it should be the parents choice to make for their child if they want them to get vaccinated or not.

 @8Y8X2TRIndependent from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8Y4G5K5 from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Once the disease has been eradicated, the vaccine should no longer be necessary.

 @8Y22VF9 from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8XZJ8PB from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8XTXFYC from California  answered…4yrs4Y

For some vaccines yes but it should be the persons choice what they want to do

 @8XTXDPR from California  answered…4yrs4Y

yes but with certain circumstances like the patient might have a life threating illeness and the vaccine has great chance in worsening it.

 @8XTV9FNDemocrat from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8XTD8JV from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8XT3KZ2 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes and no I don’t think you should take away people’s right to choose

 @8XRWPR8 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8XBKXC5Peace and Freedom from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8XB2D4T from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but the kids parents should be liable if my kid dies/goes to the ER

 @8XB22Z8 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

I agree that children should be vaccinated, such as covid-19 I think that in order to be safe you should take the vaccine because it really isn't a big deal to take it.

 @8X9GKXS from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8X9F9VDWomen’s Equality from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8X9DHBB from California  answered…4yrs4Y

I think you should have the right to choose not having it be a requierment.

 @8WZG3FY from California  answered…4yrs4Y

For under age kids it should be the parents choice if they choose to vaccinate or not

 @8WN5TY7 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but the goverment needs to wokr with parentd to find a better solution fo rthe parents who do dnot want to vaccinate thier cchildrenand for those who are concern about diseases.

 @8WFFYJH from California  answered…4yrs4Y

I used to believe so, but COVID has shown me the whole contagious disease issue has been politicized and discredited.

 @8W5YX6GIndependent from California  answered…4yrs4Y

something the parents should decide on their own and the children as well

 @8VZJDG9 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @dw6353 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, But it should only be by choice and be necessary for schools that deem vaccine viable.

 @8VHWWH2 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

it would be preferable, but at the end of the day, that is your own choice

 @8VHWTPS from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes unless the child has a legitimate medical reason to not get the vaccine. Parents found to not vaccinate intentionally should be charged with child neglect and possible other charges if other children were put in medical danger.

 @8VFHZHW from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only for people whose religious beliefs forbid the use of vaccines but also for the people who are allergic and cannot further get the vaccine due to potentially life-threatening situations.

 @8V6CCPH from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, except for actual medical reasons on why you can not get the vaccine.

 @8S89J5C from California  answered…4yrs4Y

no, if you don't want your child vaccinated then you have to watchful over them when their sick.

 @8S7JF2L from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No, I feel like it is their body their choice. If the child or parents dont want that in their Childs body it shouldn't be required.

 @8S52ZFM from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but with exceptions for those who have medical health conditions that prevent them from being able to receive vaccines

 @8RTD9B5 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

It's up to the parents on whether they want their kids to be vaccinated.

 @8RKJ5M7 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

yes with the exception of those immuno-compromised or religiously against it

 @8RCRMKP from California  answered…4yrs4Y