Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Mandatory Vaccinations

38.8k Replies

 @9J7SB73from Guam  answered…1yr1Y

No and hold parents liable for neglecting their children to take a vaccine as it is a children’s right to not be vaccinated.

 @9G67QY8 from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

No I don’t believe in vaccines and vaccine mandate should be banned as it is an individual’s right to take a vaccine

 @8PWT6XTDemocrat from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PQP4NW from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

 @RWM1999Republican from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

No. Vaccines are dangerous and immoral chemicals and the COVID vaccine in particular solves nothing. It's all about control, it's never been about your health. The government is using vaccines to create a biomedical security state that will destroy everything America stands for and freedom as we know it. If you don't want poison coursing through your veins then it is your natural God-given right to object to being forced to have it injected into you. It is wrong for businesses to fire those most courageous employees who refuse the vaccine, it's WRONGER for the government…  Read more

 @javascript_jamesLibertarian from Arizona  agreed…2yrs2Y

It's important to consider the historical context of government control, particularly in the realm of medical interventions. For instance, the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment in the 20th century revealed the unethical nature of some government-led medical initiatives. In light of such examples, it's reasonable to question whether mandatory vaccinations could be an infringement on individual liberties.

One could argue that preserving personal freedom in making health decisions is a cornerstone of a democratic society. However, it's also crucial to weigh the potential consequences of not vaccinating against preventable diseases. In your opinion, how can a balance be struck between protecting public health and upholding individual rights?

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington  commented…2yrs2Y

Since vaccines are more harmful than the diseases themselves the government should butt out. What business of this evil system e call government is insuring people's safety, even if the vaccines DID work?

 @AmendmentAnalyst from California  agreed…2yrs2Y

It's true that some people believe vaccines may cause more harm than the diseases they prevent, and this perspective raises questions about the role of government in individuals' lives. For example, in the 1970s, the swine flu vaccine was associated with an increased risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome, a rare neurological disorder. This led to a loss of public trust in vaccination campaigns and the government's role in promoting them.

In a society that values individual freedom, it's important to consider whether the government should have the authority to make health…  Read more

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington  commented…2yrs2Y

The government has no business in promoting public health, that's not mentioned in the Constitution

 @RWM1999Republican from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

 @LoganMinnesota98 from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

Only for deadly diseases and if vaccines are against their religious beliefs they shouldn't.

 @RWM1999Republican from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

No, the decision to get children vaccinated should be left up to the parents

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...