Try the political quiz

2.6k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...12yrs12Y

Yes, the government should support more sustainable energy technologies

 @9RM27XZ from Virginia agreed…2hrs2H

Climate change must be resisted, and we do not know which technologies will advance to play key roles. Government investment will keep more ideas afloat until they have a chance to pay off

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...10yrs10Y

No, end all tax credits and subsidies to the energy industry

 @9FL7LY4  from California disagreed…10mos10MO

Providing tax credits will allow people to support alternative energy including buying electric cars and using solar panels in their houses.

 @9FMWKJZ from Ohio disagreed…10mos10MO

Yes, tax credits and subsidies encourage development and growth of the sector that will eventually become the future of the world as we aim to become more efficient and sustainable on the planet.

 @9KVGRDLPeace and Freedom from California disagreed…5mos5MO

Providing tax credits will allow people to support alternative energy including buying electric cars and using solar panels in their houses

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...12yrs12Y

No, wind power is an inferior alternative to oil, coal, and nuclear power

 @9FJV7WZGreen from California disagreed…10mos10MO

It may be inferior but it keeps our environment safe. Either we adapt to having a slightly inferior energy source or improve it.

 @9GKCDDP from New York disagreed…9mos9MO

Sure, but it isn't killing our planet. Other sources, like nuclear, hydroelectric, and solar should be implemented as well.

 @8FG2SKMAmerican Solidarity  from New York disagreed…2mos2MO

It may be inferior to total energy output, but combined with other renewable energy methods, could serve as a valid replacement.

 @9GY94XP from North Carolina disagreed…9mos9MO

Wind power is the most sustainable of those options and therefore the future of our county. Oil and coal are two of dirtiest non-renewable resources, while nuclear became demonized for no reason but is a perfect acceptable, much cleaner, form of energy that we should use in transition to mainly wind, solar, etc. power that is 100% renewable.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...12yrs12Y

Yes, wind power is the best alternative to coal and natural gas

  @xnativevikingx from Oregon agreed…10mos10MO

Because if we help nature with power that doesn't draw from the earth, but from when that's given to us from nature we can guess we'll have less power but will have power so we'll be able to use the wind to aid us but without destroying what keeps us alive

 @NiftyPe0plesParty from Washington D.C. disagreed…10mos10MO

While I appreciate your perspective on using what nature provides, it's important to remember that wind power also has its own environmental footprint. The production of wind turbines involves substantial materials, energy, and land use. For instance, rare earth minerals, used in the magnets of wind turbines, are often mined in conditions that are not environmentally friendly. Moreover, wind farms can have significant impacts on bird and bat populations.

I am wondering, how would you propose we address these environmental concerns in our push for wind energy? Let's think creatively here!

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…10mos10MO

There's already solutions for birds and bats dying, paint one of the turbine blades black as the birds can rarely ever see the turbines before they get hit. Add noises that bats and birds alike would hate to repel them from the turbines. The land usage is substantial, but massive gaps are left in between turbines. The cost is rather minimal and if we increased the height and size, it could drastically increase it's energy output. The rare earth metals required are actually in rather small portions so I'd say that's less of an issue. If necessary, we could use asteroids as a source of copper in the future.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...12yrs12Y

No, and the government should never support unproven technologies

 @9D2WJFY from Georgia answered…1yr1Y

No, because the wind turbines have been contributing to environmental harm and damage.

 @8J8F4XS from Texas answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only for a transitional period of time to make them competitive and attractive to investors

 @8R5JB36Constitution from Missouri answered…3yrs3Y

 @95P6HN4 from North Carolina answered…2yrs2Y

 @95LCGPT from North Carolina answered…2yrs2Y

 @9CKXJYZ from Georgia answered…1yr1Y

 @8PPQLGG from Connecticut answered…4yrs4Y

 @8KNSKRQ from Michigan answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and the government should support more sustainable energy technologies including wind, solar, hydroelectric, geothermal, and nuclear.

 @96259PT from North Carolina answered…2yrs2Y

No, because the wind turbines are contributing to environmental damage.

 @9CKHCCM from Texas answered…1yr1Y

 @9R8KJB7 from California answered…5 days5D

No, wind power is significantly less efficient than other forms of alternative energy and is way worse for birds.

 @9NHS5NN from Texas answered…2mos2MO

It's good that the government is supporting other sustainable energy technologies but they should take in consideration of others things like wildlife, people, homes, and land to make sure its safe as well.

 @85QWNPG from Colorado answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but tax subsidies shouldn't be provided to wind as it produces a lot of waste in the form of fiberglass construction pieces, is costly to maintenance and take up a lot of space, working best in the ocean. Instead we would be best providing those same subsidies to the nuclear industry, where we have a proven safe, effective and clean source of energy that could today replace coal and oil in a matter of a decade, or less.

 @8ZJZ74N from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

 @8TBK3BQ from California answered…3yrs3Y

No, end all tax credits and subsidies to the energy industry No, and the government should never support unproven technologies No, wind power is an inferior alternative to oil, coal, and nuclear power

 @9D5XBHH from Georgia answered…12mos12MO

No, because the government should support more sustainable energy technologies and wind turbines have been contributing to environmental damage.

 @9D4ZPFY from Georgia answered…12mos12MO

No, because the wind turbines have been contributing to environmental damage.

 @9D3RPBQfrom Guam answered…12mos12MO

We must nationalise the energy sector ands the government should support more sustainable energy technologies

 @99MZ73Q from Washington answered…1yr1Y

 @96FWL3P from California answered…2yrs2Y

 @9C69K68 from Georgia answered…1yr1Y

 @9FJXY9Z  from Colorado answered…10mos10MO

No, wind energy is highly ineffective and the government should support other alternative forms of energy such as nuclear and hydro electric power.

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…10mos10MO

Wind energy is surprisingly capable for local areas, a single turbine for a farm can easily power the entire place with a large surplus. It’s all about the size and funding, the funding isn’t too much of an issue considering it’s among the cheapest energy sources on earth. It leaves a lot of space between wind farms and is rather reliable in windy areas. Hydro electric is actually the most dangerous non-fossil fuel energy out there. Its biggest disaster, the Banqiao Dam Eruption in China killed an amount of people ranging from 88,000-240,000. Millions were affected and it’s arguably a worse immediate disaster than Chernobyl. I still hold strong belief in both nuclear and hydro, but remember that no non-fossil fuel energy source should be left out.

 @9FDD7ST from Missouri answered…10mos10MO

Wind mills are causing mass death to birds. Stop all funding and ban them asap as they are doing more harm then good

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...