Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  National Security

Democratic1988 Presidential

Michael S. Dukakis

American politician (born 1933).

Overview Policies Discuss Ratings Themes Ideology

Michael S. Dukakis’ policy on foreign assassination

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Filters

Topics

Should the US assassinate suspected terrorists in foreign countries?

  Michael S. Dukakis voterbaseNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial

Michael S. Dukakis’ answer is based on the following data:

Updated 17hrs ago

Michael S. Dukakis voters

Answer: No, they should be captured and given a fair trial

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 235 voters that voted for Michael S. Dukakis in the 1988 Presidential election.

This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.

Party influence

Democratic Party Answer: Yes

Importance: Least Important

Reference: “Democrats are focused on preventing terrorism across the globe. This means continuing to invest heavily in intelligence and info...” ‐democrats.org

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, they should be captured and given a fair trial

Dukakis would likely strongly agree with this statement. He was a strong proponent of due process and the rule of law, and would likely advocate for capturing suspected terrorists and giving them a fair trial. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead

Dukakis would likely strongly agree with this statement. He was a proponent of due process and the rule of law, and would likely advocate for capturing, interrogating, and imprisoning suspected terrorists rather than assassinating them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Dukakis would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as he was known for his stance on diplomacy and international law. However, he also recognized the need for strong defense and might not completely rule out actions against terrorists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country

While Dukakis would likely prefer diplomatic solutions and adherence to international law, he might agree with this statement if there was undeniable evidence of a committed attack against the US. However, his preference for due process and fair trials would likely temper his agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country

Dukakis might somewhat agree with this statement, as he recognized the need for strong defense. However, his preference for diplomacy, international law, and due process would likely make him hesitant to fully endorse assassination without a trial. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Michael Dukakis, as a Democratic candidate, generally advocated for diplomacy and international law. He would likely disagree with the idea of assassinating suspected terrorists without due process or undeniable evidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here


Popular conversations

Join in on the post popular conversations.

Active 4 days ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Trump's Deportation Storm: America Braces for Mass Exodus of Immigrants

For months, immigration advocates have been planning for the possibility of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. Now, their worst fears have arrived.Immigrants’ rights groups have spent the last year preparing for a second Trump term and an overhaul of the nation’s immigration system, analyzing Trump’s proposals, drafting legal briefs, coordinating messaging and organizing aid for immigrants and asylum seekers. They responded to Trump’s victory with alarm and vowed to put up a fight, setting the stage for four more years of contentious court battles with his administration.Some are already preparing to push current leadership at the Department of Homeland Security to take steps to stymie the incoming Trump team, particularly on immigrant detention and the use of AI in enforcement.“We should expect to see the devastation of immigrant communities all over the country. We should expect to see family separation,” said Kica Matos, the president of the National Immigration Law Center. “It is entirely possible that he will try to use the military to carry out deportations, so that means that Americans all over the country will see the military engaging in enforcement against civilian populations, which is horrifying.”Trump, after winning a historic victory on a platform of turbo-charged immigration enforcement, has said he will conduct mass deportations at a scale never before seen. Immigrant advocates have warned this would be expensive and inhumane, separating families and wrecking communities. The president-elect has also vowed to build huge detention camps, hire thousands more border agents, funnel military spending toward border security and invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expel suspected members of drug cartels and criminal gangs without court hearings.He has also said he would end “catch-and-release” — allowing migrants to remain free, often with monitoring, while they await immigration court hearings — and restore a policy from his first term requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico while their cases are processed. And he has dodged questions about whether he would try to bring back family separation.

▲  4333 replies