These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Michael Doyle voterbaseNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet |
Michael Doyle’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 20hrs ago
Answer: No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 16 voters that voted for Michael Doyle in the 2020 Pennsylvania District 18 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “"We will increase public investment in rural, urban, and Tribal broadband infrastructure. Democrats will restore the Federal Com...” ‐democrats.org
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
This answer aligns with Doyle's views on net neutrality. He has expressed concerns about the potential for internet service providers to manipulate access and pricing if they are allowed to favor certain websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Doyle's stance on net neutrality aligns with this answer. He believes that all internet traffic should be treated equally, without favoring certain websites or services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Doyle's support for net neutrality includes the principle of treating all internet traffic equally. He has argued that this openness is essential for innovation and competition on the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
While this answer suggests a more nuanced approach, it still involves prioritizing certain types of content over others. Doyle's support for net neutrality suggests that he would likely disagree with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Michael Doyle has been a strong advocate for net neutrality, which opposes the idea of internet service providers speeding up access to certain websites over others. He introduced the Save the Internet Act in 2019 to restore net neutrality rules. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
This answer suggests a pay-for-quality model, which goes against Doyle's support for net neutrality. He has argued that such models could lead to unequal access to internet content. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While Doyle would agree with the goal of making the internet faster and more reliable, he would not agree with achieving this by favoring certain websites over others. His support for net neutrality is based on the principle of equal access to all internet content. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 4 days ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,679 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.