Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Healthcare

Democratic2020 US House of Representatives2018 US House of RepresentativesCongressional District 4Oklahoma

Mary Brannon

 

Overview Policies Discuss Ratings Themes Ideology

Mary Brannon’s policy on marijuana

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Filters

Topics

Do you support the legalization of Marijuana?

  Mary Brannon voterbaseYes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it

Mary Brannon’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 12hrs ago

Mary Brannon voters

Answer: Yes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 19 voters that voted for Mary Brannon in the 2020 Oklahoma District 4 US House of Representatives election.

This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.

Party influence

Democratic Party Answer: No

Importance: More Important

Reference: “The Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) platform committee on Monday rejected an amendment calling on the party to support mar...” ‐marijuanamoment.net

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for medical use

Mary Brannon, being a progressive candidate, is likely to support the use of marijuana for medical purposes. However, without a clear statement on this specific issue, the score cannot be a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it

Given her progressive stance, Mary Brannon is likely to support the legalization, taxation, and regulation of marijuana instead of criminalizing it. However, without a clear statement on this specific issue, the score cannot be a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

While Mary Brannon has not made a clear statement on the legalization of marijuana, her progressive stance on other issues suggests she may be open to it. However, without a clear statement, the score cannot be a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses

Mary Brannon's progressive stance suggests she may support the immediate release of those serving time solely for drug offenses. However, without a clear statement on this specific issue, the score cannot be a full 5.

Strongly disagree

No

Given her progressive stance on other issues, it is unlikely that Mary Brannon would oppose the legalization of marijuana. However, without a clear statement on this specific issue, the score cannot be a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and increase penalties for non-violent drug offenders

Mary Brannon's progressive stance and her advocacy for criminal justice reform make it highly unlikely that she would support increasing penalties for non-violent drug offenders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 16hrs ago

Party’s support base

Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 10,533 voters that identify as Democratic.

This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here


Popular conversations

Join in on the post popular conversations.

Active 6 days ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Trump's Deportation Storm: America Braces for Mass Exodus of Immigrants

For months, immigration advocates have been planning for the possibility of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. Now, their worst fears have arrived.Immigrants’ rights groups have spent the last year preparing for a second Trump term and an overhaul of the nation’s immigration system, analyzing Trump’s proposals, drafting legal briefs, coordinating messaging and organizing aid for immigrants and asylum seekers. They responded to Trump’s victory with alarm and vowed to put up a fight, setting the stage for four more years of contentious court battles with his administration.Some are already preparing to push current leadership at the Department of Homeland Security to take steps to stymie the incoming Trump team, particularly on immigrant detention and the use of AI in enforcement.“We should expect to see the devastation of immigrant communities all over the country. We should expect to see family separation,” said Kica Matos, the president of the National Immigration Law Center. “It is entirely possible that he will try to use the military to carry out deportations, so that means that Americans all over the country will see the military engaging in enforcement against civilian populations, which is horrifying.”Trump, after winning a historic victory on a platform of turbo-charged immigration enforcement, has said he will conduct mass deportations at a scale never before seen. Immigrant advocates have warned this would be expensive and inhumane, separating families and wrecking communities. The president-elect has also vowed to build huge detention camps, hire thousands more border agents, funnel military spending toward border security and invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expel suspected members of drug cartels and criminal gangs without court hearings.He has also said he would end “catch-and-release” — allowing migrants to remain free, often with monitoring, while they await immigration court hearings — and restore a policy from his first term requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico while their cases are processed. And he has dodged questions about whether he would try to bring back family separation.

▲  4333 replies