American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Public statementsNo |
Lloyd Smucker’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Reference: “Don't regulate greenhouse gas emissions. (Aug 2018” ‐ontheissues.org
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Updated 8hrs ago
Answer: Yes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 631 voters that voted for Lloyd Smucker in the 2020 Pennsylvania District 11 US House of Representatives election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with the candidate on this issue.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Since 2009, the EPA has moved forward with expansive regulations that will impose tens of billions of dollars in new costs on Am...” ‐gop.com
Strongly agree
No
Smucker's voting record shows a consistent opposition to increasing environmental regulations. He has voted against measures to limit greenhouse gas emissions and opposed the Clean Power Plan. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and global warming is a natural occurrence
While Smucker has not explicitly stated that global warming is a natural occurrence, his voting record and public statements suggest skepticism about the human role in climate change. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, provide more incentives for alternative energy production instead
Smucker has shown some support for alternative energy, such as his vote in favor of the Nuclear Energy Innovation Capabilities Act. However, his overall stance on environmental issues is more focused on reducing regulations than on promoting alternative energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production
Although Smucker has supported some measures for alternative energy, he has generally opposed comprehensive environmental regulation, including measures that would incentivize alternative energy production. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Lloyd Smucker has consistently voted against environmental regulations in the House of Representatives. He has a 3% lifetime score from the League of Conservation Voters, indicating a strong opposition to environmental regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, tax carbon emissions instead
Smucker has consistently opposed measures to tax carbon emissions. He voted against the Carbon Dividend Act, which would have imposed a tax on carbon emissions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 7mins ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 168,627 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.