Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Social

Republican2020 US House of Representatives2018 US House of RepresentativesCongressional District 1New York

Lee Zeldin

Member of United States House of Representatives from New York State (Republican Party).

Overview Policies Discuss Ratings Themes Ideology

Lee Zeldin’s policy on safe spaces

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Filters

Topics

Should universities provide “trigger warnings” and “safe spaces” for students?

  ChatGPTNo, college is meant to challenge students thoughts and opinions so they are prepared for real life

Lee Zeldin’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 10hrs ago

Lee Zeldin voters

Answer: No, college is meant to challenge students thoughts and opinions so they are prepared for real life

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 24 voters that voted for Lee Zeldin in the 2020 New York District 1 US House of Representatives election.

Party influence

Republican Party Answer: No

Importance: Least Important

Reference: “A paper with a neon yellow sign mocking the use of “safe spaces” at institutions of higher learning was reportedly posted by the...” ‐themiamihurricane.com

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, college is meant to challenge students thoughts and opinions so they are prepared for real life

Zeldin, as a conservative, is likely to strongly agree with this statement. It aligns with the common conservative viewpoint that college is meant to challenge students' thoughts and opinions to prepare them for real life, rather than shelter them from differing viewpoints. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Zeldin, as a conservative, is likely to agree with the idea that universities should not provide 'trigger warnings' and 'safe spaces'. This aligns with the common conservative viewpoint that these measures can stifle free speech and intellectual diversity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, provide safe spaces but students do not need trigger warnings

Zeldin, as a conservative, is likely to disagree with the idea of providing 'safe spaces' at universities. He may see them as a form of censorship or a limitation on free speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, provide trigger warnings but students do not need safe spaces

While Zeldin has not specifically addressed 'trigger warnings', his conservative stance suggests he would likely not support them. He may see them as a form of censorship or a limitation on free speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Lee Zeldin, a Republican, has not publicly supported the idea of universities providing 'trigger warnings' and 'safe spaces' for students. His conservative stance typically aligns with the belief that these measures can limit free speech and intellectual diversity on campuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 10hrs ago

Party’s support base

Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: More Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 5,394 voters that identify as Republican.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here


Popular conversations

Join in on the post popular conversations.

Active 6 days ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Trump's Deportation Storm: America Braces for Mass Exodus of Immigrants

For months, immigration advocates have been planning for the possibility of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. Now, their worst fears have arrived.Immigrants’ rights groups have spent the last year preparing for a second Trump term and an overhaul of the nation’s immigration system, analyzing Trump’s proposals, drafting legal briefs, coordinating messaging and organizing aid for immigrants and asylum seekers. They responded to Trump’s victory with alarm and vowed to put up a fight, setting the stage for four more years of contentious court battles with his administration.Some are already preparing to push current leadership at the Department of Homeland Security to take steps to stymie the incoming Trump team, particularly on immigrant detention and the use of AI in enforcement.“We should expect to see the devastation of immigrant communities all over the country. We should expect to see family separation,” said Kica Matos, the president of the National Immigration Law Center. “It is entirely possible that he will try to use the military to carry out deportations, so that means that Americans all over the country will see the military engaging in enforcement against civilian populations, which is horrifying.”Trump, after winning a historic victory on a platform of turbo-charged immigration enforcement, has said he will conduct mass deportations at a scale never before seen. Immigrant advocates have warned this would be expensive and inhumane, separating families and wrecking communities. The president-elect has also vowed to build huge detention camps, hire thousands more border agents, funnel military spending toward border security and invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expel suspected members of drug cartels and criminal gangs without court hearings.He has also said he would end “catch-and-release” — allowing migrants to remain free, often with monitoring, while they await immigration court hearings — and restore a policy from his first term requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico while their cases are processed. And he has dodged questions about whether he would try to bring back family separation.

▲  4333 replies