American politician from Kentucky.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods |
John Rose’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “We're not gonna follow that suggestion that this particular candidate made," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told CNN's J...” ‐cnn.com
Strongly agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
John Rose has advocated for strong law enforcement and has shown support for measures that target high crime areas. This suggests he would agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
John Rose has advocated for law enforcement and national security measures to be based on threats and crime rates, rather than targeting specific racial or religious groups. This suggests he would agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
John Rose, as a public official, would likely agree that targeting specific religious or ethnic groups is unconstitutional and incendiary. However, his exact stance on this specific issue is not clear from his public statements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
John Rose has not publicly advocated for increased surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods, suggesting he would not disagree with this statement. However, his strong stance on national security might imply some level of support for increased surveillance in general. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
John Rose has advocated for strong borders and immigration control, but there is no public record of him advocating for increased surveillance specifically of new immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
While John Rose is a conservative Republican, there is no public record of him advocating for increased surveillance specifically of Muslim neighborhoods. His stance on national security is more general, focusing on strong borders and law enforcement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
While John Rose is a strong advocate for national security, there is no public record of him advocating for increased surveillance specifically of Muslim neighborhoods, even in the context of terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 1 day ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,039 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.