American politician, 2020 Libertarian Party presidential candidate.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Public statementsYes |
Jo Jorgensen’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “I will work to remove government barriers to replacing coal-burning and oil-burning power plants in the United States with safe,...” ‐jo20.com
69% Voter Support: 9 support and 4 oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Updated 23hrs ago
Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 61,215 voters that voted for Jo Jorgensen in the 2020 Presidential election.
Libertarian Party Answer: Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “...government should not be subsidizing any particular form of energy. We oppose all government control of energy pricing, alloc...” ‐lp.org
Very strongly agree
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
This statement aligns closely with Jorgensen's Libertarian views. She supports the use of nuclear energy but opposes public subsidies for any industry, including energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
This statement aligns with Jorgensen's views on energy. She supports the use of nuclear energy as part of a diverse energy portfolio, but also supports the development of cleaner alternatives. However, she would likely oppose public investment in these alternatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
While Jorgensen supports the use of nuclear energy, she also supports the development of cleaner alternatives. However, she would likely oppose public investment in these alternatives, preferring private sector solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Jo Jorgensen, as a Libertarian, generally supports the use of nuclear energy as a part of a diverse energy portfolio. However, she would likely not strongly agree with this statement without qualifications regarding subsidies or regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Jorgensen has not expressed opposition to nuclear energy. As a Libertarian, she would likely support the use of nuclear energy as part of a free-market energy sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but with public subsidy
Jorgensen, as a Libertarian, strongly opposes public subsidies for industries, including the energy sector. She believes in a free-market approach to energy production. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and nationalize the industry
Jorgensen strongly opposes the nationalization of industries, including the energy sector. As a Libertarian, she supports free-market solutions and private ownership. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 2hrs ago
Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 67,839 voters that identify as Libertarian.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.