U.S. Representative from South Carolina.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Public statementsYes |
Jeff Duncan’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “Here's a List of the Members of Congress Who Just Told Ajit Pai to Repeal Net Neutralit” ‐vice.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Republican Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “"One of the most interesting aspects of this argument is the nature in which Republican views on Net Neutrality are divided. In ...” ‐republicanviews.org
Strongly agree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
Duncan may agree with this statement as it aligns with his free market principles and the belief that competition can lead to better services for consumers, including faster and more reliable internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Jeff Duncan, as a Republican, generally supports deregulation and free market principles. He may agree with the idea of allowing internet service providers to operate as they see fit, including speeding up access to websites that pay higher rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
Duncan may agree with this statement as it aligns with his free market principles. It suggests that internet service providers should be able to charge more for better quality service, which could lead to competition and improved services for consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
Duncan may somewhat agree with this statement as it suggests a compromise between free market principles and the need for some level of regulation to ensure fair competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given his political stance, Duncan is likely to disagree with the idea of restricting internet service providers from speeding up access to certain websites. He may see this as unnecessary regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Duncan may disagree with this statement as it suggests a need for regulation to ensure equal treatment of all internet traffic. His political stance generally favors less regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Duncan is likely to disagree with this statement as it suggests a need for regulation to prevent potential negative outcomes. His political stance generally favors less regulation and more competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 1 day ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,546 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.