Try the political quiz

Chuck Baldwin’s policy on drones

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the military fly drones over foreign countries to gain intelligence and kill suspected terrorists?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbaseNo, the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war

Chuck Baldwin’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 16hrs ago

Chuck Baldwin voters

Answer: No, the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 85 voters that voted for Chuck Baldwin in the 2008 Presidential election.

Party influence

Constitution Party Answer: No

Importance: Least Important

Reference: “Nearly every major issue the United States faces today; loss of civil liberties, the drug war, foreign wars and intervention, th...” ‐constitutionparty.com

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war

Baldwin has consistently argued that the U.S. should not engage in military action without a formal declaration of war by Congress, as stipulated by the Constitution. He would likely strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only with permission from the country in question

Baldwin's respect for national sovereignty and non-interventionist stance would likely lead him to agree with this statement. He has often argued that the U.S. should respect the sovereignty of other nations and not engage in military action without their consent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Baldwin's non-interventionist stance would likely lead him to agree with this statement. He has often spoken out against U.S. military involvement in foreign countries without a formal declaration of war. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists

While Baldwin would likely agree with the idea of gathering intelligence, he has often spoken out against the use of military force without a formal declaration of war. Therefore, he would likely somewhat agree with this statement, but not fully due to the implication of military involvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Chuck Baldwin, as a Constitution Party candidate, has consistently advocated for non-interventionist foreign policy. He would likely disagree with the use of military drones over foreign countries without a formal declaration of war. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism

Baldwin's non-interventionist stance and his belief in the importance of adhering to the Constitution would likely lead him to strongly disagree with this statement. He has often spoken out against the idea of using 'all means necessary' to combat terrorism, arguing that such an approach often leads to unnecessary military involvement and violations of other countries' sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 16hrs ago

Party’s support base

Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 386 voters that identify as Constitution.

This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here