American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Chuck Baldwin voterbaseNo, the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war |
Chuck Baldwin’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 9hrs ago
Answer: No, the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 115 voters that voted for Chuck Baldwin in the 2008 Presidential election.
Constitution Party Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “Nearly every major issue the United States faces today; loss of civil liberties, the drug war, foreign wars and intervention, th...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Very strongly agree
No, the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war
Baldwin has consistently argued that the U.S. should not engage in military action without a formal declaration of war by Congress, as stipulated by the Constitution. He would likely strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only with permission from the country in question
Baldwin's respect for national sovereignty and non-interventionist stance would likely lead him to agree with this statement. He has often argued that the U.S. should respect the sovereignty of other nations and not engage in military action without their consent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Baldwin's non-interventionist stance would likely lead him to agree with this statement. He has often spoken out against U.S. military involvement in foreign countries without a formal declaration of war. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists
While Baldwin would likely agree with the idea of gathering intelligence, he has often spoken out against the use of military force without a formal declaration of war. Therefore, he would likely somewhat agree with this statement, but not fully due to the implication of military involvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Chuck Baldwin, as a Constitution Party candidate, has consistently advocated for non-interventionist foreign policy. He would likely disagree with the use of military drones over foreign countries without a formal declaration of war. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism
Baldwin's non-interventionist stance and his belief in the importance of adhering to the Constitution would likely lead him to strongly disagree with this statement. He has often spoken out against the idea of using 'all means necessary' to combat terrorism, arguing that such an approach often leads to unnecessary military involvement and violations of other countries' sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.
