These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerNo, because it violates 4th Amendment protections. The scope of the government’s powers regarding surveillance without probable cause and a warrant should be strictly limited. |
Darren Hamilton’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No, because it violates 4th Amendment protections. The scope of the government’s powers regarding surveillance without probable cause and a warrant should be strictly limited.
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Darren Hamilton is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on May 29th, 2020
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Libertarian Party Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: “With the Patriot Act, the Federal government has given itself supreme police powers, totally ignoring the fourth amendment to th...” ‐lpin.org
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 2 days ago
Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,796 voters that identify as Libertarian.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.