54%
Yes
46%
No
54%
Yes
46%
No

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “High density residential buildings” has changed over time for 12.6k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “High density residential buildings” has changed over time for 12.6k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9LTDTR8 from Michigan answered…4 days4D

Yes, but in conjunction w/other initiatives to ensure this housing is adjacent to good public schools, health clinics, parks, community centers, addiction centers & affordable grocery & other stores/services required to live a balanced, healthy life.

 @9LW3ZGYfrom Maine answered…3 days3D

bit more nuanced than just yes or no - if constructing high density residential buildings their should be appropriate spaces such as balconies/communal gardens, this kind of space is often neglected when planning the building of such places

 @9LKMVGD from Utah answered…2wks2W

i think that certain areas should provide certain high density residential areas but not everywhere because of how expensive certain land is.

 @9LY9QSQfrom Pennsylvania answered…1hr1H

Yes, but they also have to have a scientifically proven amount of nature incorporated in the design of the buildings. And they should prioritize the collaboration of any small business the tenants have to build brick and mortar shops.

 @9LY74S8 from Nevada answered…3hrs3H

Only if costs go down so this will actually solve problems. Also, emphasis on "Incentivize" not "fund"

 @9LY2YWW  from North Carolina answered…4hrs4H

Yes in areas that are seeing an increase in residents and homelessness and maybe even have programs that can get homeless people off their feet and a temporary home. Some places do not always need to be build up.

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to America voters.