More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Democrats
Last answered 8 months ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Democrats.
Yes, local governments should be allowed to seize land for pulic projects but not for private projects
No, as long as landowners are fairly compensated, local governments should be allowed to seize land for projects that benefit the community
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 29, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
3 years ago by opposingviews.com
3 years ago by thenation.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Learn more about Eminent Domain
Eminent domain is the power of a state or a national government to take private property for public use. However, it can be legislatively delegated by the state to municipalities, government subdivisions, or even to private persons or corporations, when they are authorized to exercise the functions of public character. Opponents, including Conservatives and Libertarians in New Hampshire, oppose giving the government the power to seize property for private projects, like casinos, that was made possible to a 2005 Supreme Court decision, Kelo v. New London. Proponents, including advocates of oil pipelines and national parks, argue that the construction of roads and schools would not be possible if the government could not seize land under eminent domain. See recent eminent domain news
More stances on this issue
As long as the owner of the property is able to keep up the property and pay the taxes and maintains the property, local government should only be able to offer the owner a fair price for the land. The owner should then be able to agree or disagree to... 3 years ago from a Democrat in Raleigh, NC
Yes, private property must be bought for full price and people should not be required to sell. The government should reimburse counties for Public property and the decision to relinquish the land should go before a public hearing. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Simpson, NC
Government should never be allowed to force aperson to sell their property. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Sanford, NC
Yes. Government should only be allowed to seize private property for public use. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Mocksville, NC
Yes, if the landowners agree and are fairly compensated, then the government can seize land. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Boone, NC
Too much land is disappearing. We need to limit businesses to places where it has already been developed. i.e. old bldgs., etc. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Belmont, NC
Laws on eminent domain should remain as they are. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Charlotte, NC