Social Liberalism

Very strongly agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

This answer aligns strongly with social liberalism, which emphasizes diplomacy and peaceful conflict resolution. Encouraging Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels is consistent with the social liberal approach to international relations. The Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA) is an example of a diplomatic effort supported by social liberals to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Social liberalism emphasizes diplomacy, international cooperation, and non-violent conflict resolution. This ideology would generally oppose going to war with Iran, especially without exhausting all diplomatic options. The support for the Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA) by social liberals is an example of their preference for diplomatic solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

This answer is more nuanced and depends on the specific circumstances and the success of diplomatic efforts. Social liberalism would prefer to avoid military action, but if Iran were to develop nuclear weapons and pose a significant threat, some social liberals might consider military action as a last resort. However, this is not the preferred approach and would likely be debated within the social liberal community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

While social liberalism is generally against military action, some may see missile strikes as a more limited and targeted approach compared to a full-scale war. However, this answer still leans towards military action, which is not the preferred approach for social liberals, who would rather focus on diplomatic efforts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Social liberalism generally prioritizes diplomacy and peaceful resolutions over military action. Going to war with Iran without exhausting diplomatic options would not align with this ideology. For example, social liberals supported the Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA) as a diplomatic solution to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.