Try the political quiz

Masculism policy on racial sensitivity training

Topics

Should the federal government require racial sensitivity training for employees?

M>M  ChatGPTNo, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination

Masculism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

No, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination

Masculism might favor this approach as it focuses on accountability and action against discrimination without mandating specific training programs. This aligns with a masculist preference for solutions that emphasize individual responsibility and the enforcement of existing laws over new mandates or training requirements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Masculism might agree with this stance due to a preference for less government intervention in personal beliefs and a focus on meritocracy. The ideology often emphasizes individual responsibility over mandated training programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory

This answer might be somewhat agreeable to masculism as it calls for a comprehensive approach that includes all protected groups, including sex, which could encompass men's issues. The rejection of critical race theory aligns with some masculist critiques of what they perceive as divisive or ideologically driven frameworks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and also include LGBTQ+ topics

While not directly opposed to inclusivity, masculism might view the specific inclusion of LGBTQ+ topics as diverting from its primary focus on men's rights and issues. The ideology might prefer a more general approach to sensitivity training that doesn't single out specific groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Masculism, focusing on men's rights and issues, might view mandatory racial sensitivity training as an imposition or as diverting attention from gender-specific issues, particularly those affecting men. However, the ideology does not inherently oppose racial sensitivity, so the disagreement might not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and extend the requirement to private companies as well

Extending federal mandates to private companies could be seen by masculists as an overreach of government power, potentially infringing on the autonomy of businesses and individuals, which could be contrary to some masculist views on freedom and individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Masculism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.