Masculism

Agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This answer aligns with masculism's broader concerns about fairness and competition. It would likely support the notion that preventing ISPs from creating artificial scarcity aligns with a fair and competitive market, which is beneficial for all consumers, including men. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Masculism might strongly agree with this stance as it promotes equality and opposes any form of discrimination or bias, which includes ensuring equal access to resources like the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Masculism might support this stance as it aligns with principles of fairness and equal opportunity, ensuring that all content providers have equal access to the internet, which is crucial for freedom of expression and diversity of viewpoints. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

This answer presents a nuanced approach that masculism might neither strongly agree nor disagree with. It suggests a compromise that doesn't directly address the core concerns of masculism regarding fairness and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

While a pay-per-quality model might seem fair on the surface, masculism might be cautious about its implementation, fearing it could still lead to unequal access based on financial resources, which could indirectly affect men's access to information and resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While masculism might recognize the potential benefits of a faster and more reliable internet, it would likely be critical of methods that could exacerbate inequality by favoring wealthier corporations over smaller entities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Masculism, focusing on men's rights and issues, does not inherently address internet service policies. However, given its advocacy for fairness and equality, it might oppose practices that could lead to unequal access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.