Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

7.5k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...10yrs10Y

Decrease

 @9H5KZD4 from Utah  agreed…2yrs2Y

In the war with Ukraine, we are sending so much money, that we are basically funding the war. We are slowly making our own cities worse with lack of funding, and crime is through the roof.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...10yrs10Y

Increase

 @9H5KZD4 from Utah  disagreed…2yrs2Y

If we focus more on foreign aid, we start to neglect our own citizens and leave ourselves defenseless. We send our money and troops away. not good.

 @9LQ54QD from Illinois  agreed…1yr1Y

It will help use make connections with other countries and help us get through wars as well as for other countries.

 @9FM28JS from New York  agreed…2yrs2Y

If we increase Foreign aid we can reap the benefits of other countries support. The global economy is crucial in our own economy and working with others is the best way to succeed.

 @9HDX6Q4agreed…2yrs2Y

This way, we are less likely to be attacked and will establish peace to other countries and inside America.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...10yrs10Y

Decrease, and we should not give foreign aid to any countries

 @9GTGH6R from Indiana  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Foreign aid is a long term investment not only in the quality of life for global citizens, but also for the national security of the united states.

 @9GRNN6G from South Carolina  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Because we should focus on the things we have going in our country first and paying off our large amount of national debt.

 @9GZ86KGJustice party member from Virginia  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I think they should not decrease the foreign aid because it can help people to save their lives from something bad happening to them

 @9GSHSY2 from California  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I think they should not decrease the foreign aid because it can help people to save their lives from something bad happening to them.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...8yrs8Y

Decrease, and deny aid to countries that harbor or promote terrorism

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...10yrs10Y

Decrease, until we drastically reduce our national budget deficit

 @9FM28JS from New York  disagreed…2yrs2Y

My counter-argument would be that Foreign aid and helping other countries can greatly improve out relationships with other countries resulting in more trade overall for a better global economy

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...10yrs10Y

Increase, but only for countries that have no human rights violations

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...10yrs10Y

I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

 @cryingleftist from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

Increase but only if the US gets a say in what the funds are used for. For example, if Nigeria was a country being funded the US should get to say that their funds should not be supporting SARS.

 @8JCJLWVUnity from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

This is a complicated topic; for example, I read that some foreign aid distorts local industry and development. Much more thought is needed.

 @9MFBRSL from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

Increase only for countries with clear humanitarian needs like Ukraine. Deny aid for countries that harbor or promote terrorism

 @9GWQR8F from Kansas  answered…2yrs2Y

I am satisfied with the current amount of spending, but be more selective on who we give to and how much

 @9GN5KWP from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

Increase for countries with clear humanitarian needs, but deny aid to countries that violate human rights and harbor or promote terrorism

 @9FHJ8V6 from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Increase, but only aid those who are in a relationship with the U.S. or are included in NATO or the United Nations.

 @OtterSkylarLibertarian from Indiana  disagreed…2yrs2Y

While it's understandable to prioritize alliances, this approach might overlook nations that are in dire need but are not necessarily aligned with the U.S., NATO, or part of the UN. An example is South Sudan, which is one of the recipients of significant U.S. aid despite its challenging political situation. Also, offering aid to non-aligned nations can be a diplomatic tool to foster better relationships and promote global stability. What are your thoughts on this?

 @L3gislatorDoveGreen from Illinois  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I hear where you're coming from, but let's not forget that foreign aid isn't purely altruistic. It's also a strategic tool. Consider the Marshall Plan after WWII, where the U.S. aided Europe for its recovery, but also to curb Soviet influence. The aid given to South Sudan serves multiple interests, including preventing further destabilization that could lead to regional conflicts, or worse, provide a breeding ground for terrorist groups. It's a complex issue, isn't it? Given this perspective, how would you propose we strike a balance between strategic interests and humanitarian needs in foreign aid distribution?

 @OtterSkylarLibertarian from Indiana  disagreed…2yrs2Y

You're absolutely right that foreign aid has been historically used as a strategic tool, like in the case of the Marshall Plan. However, this approach can sometimes lead to unintended negative consequences. For instance, while the U.S. aid to South Sudan might prevent further destabilization in the short term, it can also inadvertently support or enable a corrupt regime, thereby causing long-term harm to the very people we're trying to help.

Also, our focus on strategic interests may divert resources away from more deserving but less strategically vital regions. This risks perpetuat…  Read more

 @L3gislatorDoveGreen from Illinois  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I see your point about the potential for aid to inadvertently support corrupt regimes, and the suggestion to tie aid to good governance and human rights is a compelling one. However, it does open up another set of challenges. For instance, what happens when a nation fails to meet these standards? Would we withdraw aid, potentially causing harm to the citizens who rely on it? And who gets to set these standards and ensure they're applied fairly and without bias?

For example, take the case of Ethiopia. It's one of the largest recipients of U.S. aid in Africa, and while it's made…  Read more

 @9DLL4YZDemocrat  from Massachusetts  answered…3mos3MO

We should spend every tax dollar wisely—and that includes the small slice we invest in foreign aid, which is less than 1% of the federal budget. That funding helps prevent wars, fight terrorism, stop pandemics before they reach our shores, and strengthen our alliances in a dangerous world. Pulling back too far has already weakened our global influence, and left room for China and Russia to step in. If we want to protect American interests and values, we’ve got to show up. That doesn’t mean writing blank checks—it means smart, targeted investments that make America safer, stronger, and more respected

 @9ZLWXN2  from Maine  answered…8mos8MO

Decrease, and aid should be dependent on a move away from corruption and toward political and economic freedom

 @9ZL497P from Oklahoma  answered…8mos8MO

Stay the same but only for those that are in critical danger and don't have large military as the U.S does

 @9LF5SCS from New Jersey  answered…1yr1Y

we should decrease aid to countries that are more than capable of supporting themselves. We should also end support of any nation that is violating human rights or other international laws

 @9L4Z23BIndependent  from Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

Decrease, we need to end military aid to non-ally countries unless they agree to buy weapons. Humanitarian aid should be capped

 @9L74FFC from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

Increase only for countries with clear humanitarian needs. Deny or at least decrease aid for countries that frequently violate human rights or harbor/support terrorism

 @9D3RPBQfrom Guam  answered…2yrs2Y

I want to give foreign aid if those countries are radically left-wing Or desperate countries

 @Sam-From-The-Pool  from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

Redirect from developed countries or countries with human rights violations to developing countries that need it

 @9GH8HH3Socialist from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

If they can send $100 billion to Isreal but 'can't' afford to improve our social programs and the lives of all citizens, then yes they should cut foreign spending.

 @97FJZ7M from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Decrease for countries with Human Rights violations. HEAVILY decrease for Israel.

 @58NVHL8from California  answered…5yrs5Y

What agenda are we pursuing? If we seek the eradication of disease and human misery, then we should fund international agencies like the WHO. If we seek to meddle in the internal affairs of other countries, we should stay home and mind our own business.

 @8PJPGCH from Oregon  answered…5yrs5Y

 @RobinHoudeSocialistfrom Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

Increase, but helping other countries is an international issue and should be done through an international body like the UN

 @8S4HTQ7 from Colorado  answered…4yrs4Y

Decrease, deny aid to countries that promote/harbor terrorism and/or have gross human rights violations

 @92FF8QD from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

The US has a chance to help, when its own country is stable, countries that are in crisis.

 @9HDN9FHLibertarian from Iowa  answered…2yrs2Y

Decrease how much is being spent slowly while incorporating ways to help these countries establish themselves on their own.

 @9D46Z3T from Florida  answered…2yrs2Y

Foreign aid spending should be based on assessment of national security and that of allies

 @96VWVYW from Colorado  answered…3yrs3Y

 @96M7YNX from Maine  answered…3yrs3Y

 @B5Y6WXQDemocrat from North Carolina  answered…2 days2D

Maintain current spending to countries at war with adversaries such as Russia but decrease to countries with human rights violations such as Israel

 @7YS3KJPIndependent  from Arizona  answered…2 days2D

Increase. I would like to see a growing national/governmental interest in the promotion of micro-financing as an alternative way for foreign aid provision.

 @B5XYG3X from Florida  answered…3 days3D

Decrease for countries that: are not in NATO, do not attempt military buildup and harbor terrorists or promote terrorism.

 @B5XRWKF from Louisiana  answered…4 days4D

Again an external auditor should look over the budget and help determine what the money is being spent on and then make logical decisions about how to spend the money.

 @B5XH65N from California  answered…5 days5D

increase humanitarian support, redirect whatever is being spent on foreign military spending towards more humanitarian efforts

 @B5WDD24 from North Carolina  answered…1wk1W

Increase only for countries with clear humanitarian needs who are equipped to handle the money in a non-corrupt manner like Ukraine. Deny non-humanitarian aid for countries that violate trade deals or human rights and harbor/promote terrorism

 @B5VLC98  from Maryland  answered…2wks2W

Foreign aid spending should be clearly connected to the national interest, and should contribute to the development of American soft power

 @B5TTN2MCommunist  from New York  answered…2wks2W

I'm satisfied with the current amount of spending, but deny aid to countries that harbor or promote terrorism (*cough* *cough* israel *cough* *cough*

 @B5SYZ76 from New York  answered…3wks3W

Deny aid to countries that harbor or promote terrorism or tyranny, and impeach Trump for gutting foreign aid to the needy to pay trillions to capitalist bloodsuckers

 @B5SJGLT from Arkansas  answered…3wks3W

We should increase aid, but we need to keep our eyes open and be aware of what is going on in the world to determine which countries will get our support and which won't get our support.

 @B5P54P6  from Georgia  answered…1mo1MO

Increase, we need to understand that every responsibly managed dollar spent abroad is to secure an interest back home

 @B5NNLBGNo Labelsfrom Maine  answered…1mo1MO

Foreing aid should be heavily screened and regulated, to make sure the money and material are spent according to its use

 @B5FBC8Gfrom Virgin Islands  answered…2mos2MO

The amount of spending is fine, WHERE it is being spent is not. Aid should not come with requirements for neoliberalization of national economies.

 @B5CZ7WB from California  answered…2mos2MO

Increase, especially to countries whose current socioeconomic status is a historical result of the Untied States’ foreign policies.

 @6V83S78  from Michigan  answered…2mos2MO

I think Western powers have an obligation to reparate the Global South, but currently, US aid is primarily used for nefarious means of furthering US national interests at the expense of the nations they are "helping".

 @B58JJKS from Kansas  answered…2mos2MO

Neither and cut foreign aid form the United States and give it to NATO and the United Nations so they can provide for nations across the world

 @6V83S78  from Michigan  answered…2mos2MO

I am for foreign aid spending on research and humanitarian aid, but not for influencing foreign governments or funding military organizations.

 @B54LP46 from Oklahoma  answered…2mos2MO

decrease for those that have no human rights violations, and harboring/promoting terrorism. Decreasing our national budget deficit too.

 @B54BY5Z from New Mexico  answered…2mos2MO

Only in times when we are capable of supporting other nations; we should focus on our own citizens before others, but if we are able, it is morally correct to provide the people of the world with the rights we build our constitution upon.

 @B4ZG5WQ from Montana  answered…2mos2MO

I'd say Decrease because unless the country receiving aid respects and sides with the US, I don't see the point in helping.

 @B4X346T from Pennsylvania  answered…2mos2MO

decrease. countries that are our enemies don't need foreign aid and Israel doesn't need us, despite them being our friend.

 @B4WSZQ5 from Florida  answered…2mos2MO

Increase, but ensure that the spending goes to helping humanitarian projects that prevent violations of human rights

 @B4VDCZ7 from California  answered…2mos2MO

increase, but only help the countrys that ask, or have human rights violations so large that the people are all in danger. and not impose our ideas onto them

 @B4TRX27 from Kansas  answered…2mos2MO

Increase, but only once we have our country's debt under control. We have a long way to go within our own country before we have the means to send aid elsewhere.

 @B4S4QRZ from Michigan  answered…2mos2MO

Regardless, we should reevaluate and audit the amount of money being spent on foreign aid so that the expenditures align with our long-term strategic aims.

 @B4NXQ2C from Texas  answered…3mos3MO

I believe we should support the freedom and rights of other countries and their citizens. We should not fund wars/massacres.

 @B4NGX2R from Illinois  answered…3mos3MO

Decrease, but keep relationship with allied countries decent, as to not create conflict and refocus on spending on communities.

 @B4M6797 from Missouri  answered…3mos3MO

Increase, but it needs to be fully transparent and voted on and in situations where a country has the ability to pay back the aid in some form (minerals, raw materials, etc), that should be looked into.

 @9ZTQW4V  from Texas  answered…3mos3MO

Maintain or moderately increase foreign aid, prioritizing effectiveness, transparency, and support for allies and humanitarian efforts. Recognize that U.S. leadership abroad strengthens our security at home.

 @B4KLCSB from California  answered…3mos3MO

We should decrease foreign aid to countries that harbor and or promote terrorism and if their governments can't show receipts for how they are using the foreign aid money to help their population

 @B4K36GPNo Labels from Maryland  answered…3mos3MO

Increase, to help countries without human rights or in certain wartime scenarios. (Ex: Ukraine v Russia)

 @B4G7DSX from Kansas  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, but allow there to be civilian oversight on the operations which USAID engages in to make sure there are no subversive actions taking place

 @B4FCJW4Republican from Georgia  answered…3mos3MO

Decrease for the sake of low taxes and low national debt. However, still help the world within reason, but put America first.

 @B4D8G3GDemocrat from Pennsylvania  answered…3mos3MO

Increase on smaller countries to make them try to go green or help the environment by reducing their emissions and they grow.

 @B4CBZ67 from Texas  answered…3mos3MO

Increase but only if the US has control where the funds go. It should go to where it is needed the most and not on b.s causes

 @B4C4254 from Texas  answered…3mos3MO

decrease for sure why because we send billion of dollars to Africa to find cures for their sickness while us tax payers are struggling to keep up with this economy.

 @B492HZC from Kansas  answered…3mos3MO

I think we should give government aid spending to countries that are being at war with greedy countries.

 @B48SMYG from Florida  answered…3mos3MO

Only for basic humanitarian aid, after the deficit can be reduced and homelessness domestically is reduced.

 @B48JB7F from Virginia  answered…3mos3MO

If the United States either caused wars, it should help countries that are affected, and some goes with countries that need help.

 @B476T4Panswered…3mos3MO

The us should only provide aid for our allies if it is absolutely needed for that country's well being.

 @B458H8RSocialist from Michigan  answered…3mos3MO

Depends on what you classify as "foreign aid" since it could mean funding CIA operations in other nations.

 @B44J8JM from North Carolina  answered…3mos3MO

The US should spend less on other countries unless their in NATO. The US should focus on our own problems and fix our financial debt.

 @B42MF4ZNo Labels from West Virginia  answered…3mos3MO

I wish I could say increase, but right now we just can’t afford to help foreign countries. We need to take care of ourselves first before we can provide for others.

 @B3XZH2Z from Ohio  answered…4mos4MO

Depends on what the foreign aid is being used for. I don’t want my tax dollars being used to bomb innocent civilians but I think every innocent person even if they are in a country with human rights violations deserves the right to food, shelter, etc

 @B3XQXT7 from South Dakota  answered…4mos4MO

The amount of foreign aid spending is fine, but it should not be used to promote coups, pro-US governments/lobbies, or to benefit the rich over the poor.

 @B3VKVWT from Florida  answered…4mos4MO

Stay the same, remove aid to counties that harbor terrorists and reallocate those funds into other, friendlier countries

 @B3T3SC7 from Georgia  answered…4mos4MO

Increase for the nations that really need it but while also prioritizing the nations that need it more based on humanitarian crises

 @B3S8PXZ from Indiana  answered…4mos4MO

Our foreign aid policy and projects need to be reformed. I believe that our country does a lot of good overseas and that we should not abandon other nations in need of support in certain areas. But to spend money on every single issue under the sun is wasteful. There is a way that we can go about with this, without spending ridiculous amounts of money on things that are on the responsibility of those countries' own leaders.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...